Usage Score
11.8
Player Dossier
2006-2008Ball State
Madaris Grant
TE • 6'5" • 238 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Madaris Grant reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
59.5
Consistency
48.1
Season Value
54.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Ball State
0607070808
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ball State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Madaris Grant, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Ball State. Madaris Grant reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Ball State paired 285 primary output with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 59.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2008 Postseason · Ball State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
23.8
Efficiency
59.5
Usage
11.8
Consistency
48.1
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tulsa: 25. Unknown: 24. Navy: 36. Akron: 20. Kent State: 29. Toledo: 19. Western Kentucky: 5. Eastern Michigan: 92. Northern Illinois: 2. Miami (OH): 8. Central Michigan: 18. Buffalo: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tulsa: 1 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 53.3. Navy: 4 by 60. Akron: 2 by 66.7. Kent State: 3 by 64.4. Toledo: 2 by 63.3. Western Kentucky: 1 by 33.3. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 100. Northern Illinois: 1 by 13.3. Miami (OH): 1 by 53.3. Central Michigan: 2 by 60. Buffalo: 1 by 46.7
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins25.4 · Games = 9 · +9.4 vs Losses
Losses16 · Games = 2 · -9.4 vs Wins
First Half25.5 · Games = 6 · +3.5 vs Second Half
Second Half22 · Games = 6 · -3.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Eastern Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Tulsa
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 1/7 | @ Tulsa | L 13-45 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 12/6 | @ Buffalo | L 24-42 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Thu 11/20 | @ Central Michigan | W 31-24 | — | 2 | 18 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 18 |
| Wed 11/12 | @ Miami (OH) | W 31-16 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Thu 11/6 | vs Northern Illinois | W 45-14 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sat 10/25 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 38-16 | — | 5 | 92 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/11 | @ Western Kentucky | W 24-7 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Toledo | W 31-0 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Kent State | W 41-20 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Akron | W 41-24 | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 14 |
| Fri 9/5 | vs Navy | W 35-23 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 16 |
| Thu 8/28 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ball State
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
20062007200720082008
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Ball State | 1 | 6.7 | 9.1 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Ball State | 119 | 66.9 | 7.5 | 118 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Ball State | 119 | 66.9 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Ball State | 285 | 59.5 | 11.8 | 166 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Ball State | 285 | 59.5 | 11.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Eastern Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
92
Primary metric
92 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Eastern Michigan
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 64.4 efficiency score.
#3
Nebraska
21
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
21 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Tulsa
25
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
25 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
13
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
13 receiving yards with a 86.7 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Ball State
285 primary output · 59.5 efficiency · 11.8 usage
54.9
#2
2008 Regular Season · Ball State
54.9
285 primary · 59.5 efficiency · 11.8 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Ball State
46.4
119 primary · 66.9 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7222
Mt. Healthy · Cincinnati, OH
- Committed To
- Ball State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2005
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
405
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.