Player Stats

Nyan Boateng College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
707
Receptions
46
Touchdowns
7

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2005 Regular SeasonFlorida4477044.3
2008 PostseasonCalifornia12327078.2
2008 Regular SeasonCalifornia1226412578.2
2009 PostseasonCalifornia8125056.8
2009 Regular SeasonCalifornia812166256.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

California paired 439 primary output with 85.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 80.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Florida, California.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Maryland

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · California

Games

8

Receiving Yards / G

23.9

Efficiency

80.4

Usage

9.9

Consistency

70.3

Best Game by takeover score

Maryland

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Utah: 25. Maryland: 44. Eastern Washington: 4. Minnesota: 30. UCLA: 14. Arizona State: 12. Oregon State: 27. Washington: 35

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 1 by 100. Maryland: 2 by 100. Eastern Washington: 1 by 26.7. Minnesota: 2 by 100. UCLA: 2 by 46.7. Arizona State: 1 by 80. Oregon State: 2 by 90. Washington: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins20.8 · Games = 5 · -8.2 vs Losses
Losses29 · Games = 3 · +8.2 vs Wins