Player Stats

Jessie Hester College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,226
Receptions
107
Touchdowns
8

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2005 Regular SeasonSouth Florida4337043
2006 Regular SeasonSouth Florida0-00-
2007 PostseasonSouth Florida12441067.9
2007 Regular SeasonSouth Florida1231377467.9
2008 PostseasonSouth Florida13122075.1
2008 Regular SeasonSouth Florida1353557375.1
2009 PostseasonSouth Florida7230059
2009 Regular SeasonSouth Florida713162159

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason

South Florida paired 579 primary output with 74.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 80.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UConn

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · South Florida

Games

7

Receiving Yards / G

27.4

Efficiency

80.3

Usage

16.6

Consistency

67.2

Best Game by takeover score

UConn

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Northern Illinois: 30. Cincinnati: 41. West Virginia: 4. Rutgers: 13. Louisville: 43. Miami: 16. UConn: 45

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northern Illinois: 2 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 91.1. West Virginia: 1 by 26.7. Rutgers: 1 by 86.7. Louisville: 5 by 57.3. Miami: 1 by 100. UConn: 2 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins25.7 · Games = 3 · -3.1 vs Losses
Losses28.8 · Games = 4 · +3.1 vs Wins