Player Stats

Ben Busbee College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
212
Receptions
16
Touchdowns
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2006 Regular SeasonSouth Florida1114055.6
2007 Regular SeasonSouth Florida2318047
2008 PostseasonSouth Florida5234165.7
2008 Regular SeasonSouth Florida5565165.7
2009 Regular SeasonSouth Florida5581267.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

South Florida paired 81 primary output with 88 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Regular Season role shape

target-driven usage with 88 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Louisville

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Regular Season · South Florida

Games

5

Receiving Yards / G

16.2

Efficiency

88

Usage

7.3

Consistency

75.3

Best Game by takeover score

Louisville

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 17. Charleston Southern: 14. Florida State: 8. Cincinnati: 14. Louisville: 28

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 1 by 100. Charleston Southern: 1 by 93.3. Florida State: 1 by 53.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 93.3. Louisville: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins16.8 · Games = 4 · +2.8 vs Losses
Losses14 · Games = 1 · -2.8 vs Wins