Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Western Michigan paired 3,727 primary output with 60.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Tim Hiller College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 11,220
- Passing yards
- 11,329
- Touchdowns
- 103
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 7 | 1,393 | 1,334 | 59 | 21 | 50 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2007 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 12 | 2,952 | 3,021 | -69 | 22 | 59.6 |
| 2008 Postseason | Western Michigan | 13 | 198 | 198 | 0 | 2 | 67.7 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 13 | 3,529 | 3,527 | 2 | 35 | 67.7 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Western Michigan | 12 | 3,148 | 3,249 | -101 | 23 | 61.2 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 53 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Win with 293 yards of offense and 81.2 efficiency. It landed in the 66.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Western Michigan
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
262.3
Efficiency
53
Usage
12
Consistency
80.6
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Michigan: 246. Indiana: 252. Miami (OH): 161. Hofstra: 340. Northern Illinois: 173. Toledo: 293. Central Michigan: 396. Buffalo: 344. Kent State: 225. Michigan State: 88. Eastern Michigan: 275. Ball State: 355
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan: 43 by 48.4. Indiana: 45 by 54.2. Miami (OH): 34 by 52.9. Hofstra: 45 by 61.3. Northern Illinois: 36 by 39.8. Toledo: 29 by 81.2. Central Michigan: 69 by 51.6. Buffalo: 57 by 53.7. Kent State: 54 by 49.6. Michigan State: 40 by 41.4. Eastern Michigan: 36 by 57.2. Ball State: 65 by 44.6
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins282.6 · Games = 5 · +34.7 vs Losses
Losses247.9 · Games = 7 · -34.7 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Tim Hiller
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.