Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2006-2009Eastern Michigan
Terrence Blevins
RB • 6'1" • Detroit, MI, USA
Balanced backfield optionSteady chain mover
Terrence Blevins leans balanced backfield option traits and 27.6 efficiency.
Efficiency
27.6
Consistency
54.2
Season Value
26.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Eastern Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Terrence Blevins, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan. Terrence Blevins leans balanced backfield option traits and 27.6 efficiency.
Terrence Blevins played RB for Eastern Michigan. Across 4 tracked seasons, Terrence Blevins recorded 874 rushing yards, 87 receiving yards, and 14 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2008 with Eastern Michigan.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Eastern Michigan paired 651 primary output with 42 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 27.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2009 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern
Loss with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
Games
9
Scrimmage Yards / G
12.4
Efficiency
27.6
Usage
9
Consistency
54.2
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 29. Michigan: 22. Temple: 8. Central Michigan: 11. Kent State: 22. Arkansas: 10. Northern Illinois: 3. Western Michigan: 6. Toledo: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 9 by 33.6. Michigan: 5 by 45.8. Temple: 4 by 20.8. Central Michigan: 3 by 38.2. Kent State: 11 by 20.8. Arkansas: 4 by 32.3. Northern Illinois: 2 by 15.6. Western Michigan: 2 by 31.3. Toledo: 1 by 10.4
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses12.4 · Games = 9
First Half18.4 · Games = 5 · +13.4 vs Second Half
Second Half5 · Games = 4 · -13.4 vs First Half
All Games12.4 · Games = 9
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Northwestern
Best efficiency game
45.8 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/21 | @ Toledo | L 21-47 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Western Michigan | L 14-35 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Fri 11/6 | @ Northern Illinois | L 6-50 | 2 | 3 | 1.50 | 0 | — | — | 1.5 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Arkansas | L 27-63 | 2 | 7 | 3.50 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 2.5 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Kent State | L 6-28 | 11 | 22 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 10/10 | @ Central Michigan | L 8-56 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Temple | L 12-24 | 4 | 8 | 2 | 1 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Michigan | L 17-45 | 5 | 22 | 4.40 | 0 | — | — | 4.4 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Northwestern | L 24-27 | 9 | 29 | 3.20 | 1 | — | — | 3.2 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Eastern Michigan
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 114 | 41.3 | 12.8 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 84 | 45.7 | 4.4 | -30 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 651 | 42 | 20.9 | 567 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Eastern Michigan | 112 | 27.6 | 9 | -539 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game driven by a workhorse rushing load.
188
Primary metric
188 scrimmage yards and 32.9 usage.
#2
Bowling Green
21
Primary metric
Loss with 21 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
21 scrimmage yards and 3.3 usage.
#3
Northern Illinois
34
Primary metric
Loss with 34 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
34 scrimmage yards and 23.5 usage.
#4
Ohio
35
Primary metric
Loss with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
35 scrimmage yards and 19.6 usage.
#5
Northwestern
29
Primary metric
Loss with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
29 scrimmage yards and 17.3 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
651 primary output · 42 efficiency · 20.9 usage
52.1
#2
2006 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
36.2
114 primary · 41.3 efficiency · 12.8 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Eastern Michigan
27.5
84 primary · 45.7 efficiency · 4.4 usage
Milestones
1
100+ rush yards
1
150+ scrimmage yards
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2006 · Rating 0.7889
Denby · Detroit, MI
- Committed To
- Eastern Michigan
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2006
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
961
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.