Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 4,774 primary output with 68.2 efficiency.
Player Stats
Dan LeFevour College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Total offense
- 15,853
- Passing yards
- 12,905
- Rushing yards
- 2,948
- Touchdowns
- 150
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Central Michigan | 14 | 231 | 162 | 69 | 2 | 72.6 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 14 | 3,321 | 2,869 | 452 | 31 | 72.6 |
| 2007 Postseason | Central Michigan | 14 | 406 | 292 | 114 | 6 | 82.7 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 14 | 4,368 | 3,360 | 1,008 | 41 | 82.7 |
| 2008 Postseason | Central Michigan | 11 | 309 | 253 | 56 | 2 | 78.5 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 11 | 3,067 | 2,531 | 536 | 25 | 78.5 |
| 2009 Postseason | Central Michigan | 14 | 407 | 395 | 12 | 2 | 79.7 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 14 | 3,744 | 3,043 | 701 | 41 | 79.7 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 66 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Buffalo
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 85.7th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
14
Primary Metric / G
296.5
Efficiency
66
Usage
37.6
Consistency
82.3
Best Game by takeover score
Buffalo
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 407. Arizona: 126. Michigan State: 338. Alcorn State: 101. Akron: 337. Buffalo: 366. Eastern Michigan: 362. Western Michigan: 313. Bowling Green: 275. Boston College: 178. Toledo: 360. Ball State: 403. Northern Illinois: 279. Ohio: 306
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 64 by 56.5. Arizona: 40 by 48.5. Michigan State: 59 by 57.5. Alcorn State: 15 by 69.3. Akron: 50 by 72. Buffalo: 49 by 72.7. Eastern Michigan: 33 by 78.2. Western Michigan: 45 by 68.9. Bowling Green: 44 by 71.6. Boston College: 45 by 52. Toledo: 50 by 68.3. Ball State: 42 by 82.9. Northern Illinois: 47 by 64.4. Ohio: 56 by 61.5
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins320.6 · Games = 12 · +168.6 vs Losses
Losses152 · Games = 2 · -168.6 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Dan LeFevour
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.