Usage Score
19.5
Player Dossier
2006-2009Central Michigan
Bryan Anderson
WR • 6'5" • Rockford, MI, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Bryan Anderson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
69.8
Consistency
56
Season Value
55.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Central Michigan
0606070708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Central Michigan
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Temple
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Bryan Anderson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Central Michigan. Bryan Anderson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Central Michigan paired 865 primary output with 83 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 69.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Western Michigan
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Central Michigan
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
56
Efficiency
69.8
Usage
19.5
Consistency
56
Best Game by takeover score
Troy
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Troy: 84. Arizona: 15. Michigan State: 120. Unknown: 12. Akron: 22. Buffalo: 95. Eastern Michigan: 17. Western Michigan: 133. Bowling Green: 22. Boston College: 65. Toledo: 67. Ball State: 43. Northern Illinois: 35. Ohio: 54
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Troy: 7 by 80. Arizona: 2 by 50. Michigan State: 6 by 100. Unknown: 2 by 40. Akron: 3 by 48.9. Buffalo: 8 by 79.2. Eastern Michigan: 2 by 56.7. Western Michigan: 7 by 100. Bowling Green: 3 by 48.9. Boston College: 6 by 72.2. Toledo: 4 by 100. Ball State: 4 by 71.7. Northern Illinois: 3 by 77.8. Ohio: 7 by 51.4
Split Comparison
Wins62.9 · n=11 · +22.9 vs Losses
Losses40 · n=2 · -22.9 vs Wins
First Half52.1 · n=7 · -7.7 vs Second Half
Second Half59.9 · n=7 · +7.7 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Western Michigan
Best efficiency game
100 vs Toledo
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 1/7 | @ Troy | W 44-41 | — | 7 | 84 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 12/5 | vs Ohio | W 20-10 | — | 7 | 54 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 11 |
| Fri 11/27 | vs Northern Illinois | W 45-31 | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 16 |
| Thu 11/19 | @ Ball State | W 35-3 | — | 4 | 43 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 12 |
| Thu 11/12 | vs Toledo | W 56-28 | — | 4 | 67 | 16.8 | 16.80 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Boston College | L 10-31 | — | 6 | 65 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Bowling Green | W 24-10 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 1 | 9 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ Western Michigan100 receiving yards | W 34-23 | — | 7 | 133 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 65 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 56-8 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ BuffaloHigh volume | W 20-13 | — | 8 | 95 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 9/26 | vs Akron | W 48-21 | — | 3 | 22 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 2 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Michigan State100 receiving yards | W 29-27 | — | 6 | 120 | 20 | 20 | 0 | 42 |
| Sun 9/6 | @ Arizona | L 6-19 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 9 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Central Michigan
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
20062006200720072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Postseason | Central Michigan | 867 | 67.8 | 25.8 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 867 | 67.8 | 25.8 | 0 |
| 2007 Postseason | Central Michigan | 1,132 | 78 | 25.4 | 265 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 1,132 | 78 | 25.4 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Central Michigan | 865 | 83 | 22.1 | -267 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 865 | 83 | 22.1 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Central Michigan | 784 | 69.8 | 19.5 | -81 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Central Michigan | 784 | 69.8 | 19.5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Temple
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
149
Primary metric
149 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Western Michigan
133
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
154
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
154 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kentucky
137
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Purdue
129
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
129 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Central Michigan
865 primary output · 83 efficiency · 22.1 usage
65.5
#2
2008 Regular Season · Central Michigan
65.5
865 primary · 83 efficiency · 22.1 usage
#3
2007 Postseason · Central Michigan
65.4
1,132 primary · 78 efficiency · 25.4 usage
Milestones
13
100+ receiving yards
12
8+ catch outings
4
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2003 · Rating 0.7667
St. Xavier · Cincinnati, OH
- Committed To
- South Carolina
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2003
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
3,648
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 54 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.