Usage Score
8.7
Player Dossier
2006-2008Tulsa
WR • 6'4" • 203 lbs • Jenks, OK, USA
Jesse Meyer reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
8.7
Efficiency
92.2
Consistency
62.2
Season Value
48.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Tulsa
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jesse Meyer, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason · Tulsa. Jesse Meyer reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Postseason
Tulsa paired 585 primary output with 87.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 92.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2008 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UAB
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
6
Receiving Yards / G
26.7
Efficiency
92.2
Usage
8.7
Consistency
62.2
Best Game by takeover score
Ball State
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Ball State: 19. UAB: 46. North Texas: 39. New Mexico: 23. Tulane: 13. East Carolina: 20
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Ball State: 1 by 100. UAB: 2 by 100. North Texas: 2 by 100. New Mexico: 1 by 100. Tulane: 1 by 86.7. East Carolina: 2 by 66.7
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
6 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UAB
Best efficiency game
100 vs Ball State
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tulsa
2006-2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulsa | 97 | 66.7 | 7.6 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Tulsa | 585 | 87.7 | 12.4 | 488 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulsa | 585 | 87.7 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Tulsa | 160 | 92.2 | 8.7 | -425 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Tulsa | 160 | 92.2 | 8.7 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114
Primary metric
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UAB
46
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Rice
27
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
27 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Bowling Green
97
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
North Texas
39
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
39 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2007 Postseason · Tulsa
585 primary output · 87.7 efficiency · 12.4 usage
64.9
#2
2007 Regular Season · Tulsa
64.9
585 primary · 87.7 efficiency · 12.4 usage
#3
2008 Postseason · Tulsa
48.9
160 primary · 92.2 efficiency · 8.7 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2003 · Rating 0.8
Aplington Parkersburg · Parkersburg, IA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
842
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jesse Meyer quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit