Usage Score
4
Player Dossier
2005-2009Rice
RB • 5'10" • Humble, TX, USA
Marcus Knox leans balanced backfield option traits and 37.4 efficiency.
Usage Score
4
Efficiency
37.4
Consistency
46.9
Season Value
46.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Rice
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Marcus Knox, RB. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · Rice. Marcus Knox leans balanced backfield option traits and 37.4 efficiency.
Marcus Knox played RB for Rice. Across 5 tracked seasons, Marcus Knox recorded 166 rushing yards, 34 receiving yards, and 3 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2009 with Rice.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
Rice paired 57 primary output with 36.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 37.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Houston
Loss with 20 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
7.6
Efficiency
37.4
Usage
4
Consistency
46.9
Best Game by takeover score
Houston
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 12. Texas Tech: 6. Oklahoma State: -3. Tulsa: 0. Navy: 5. East Carolina: 12. UCF: 11. SMU: 6. Tulane: 2. UTEP: 13. Houston: 20
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 2 by 62.5. Texas Tech: 1 by 62.5. Oklahoma State: 1 by 0. Navy: 1 by 52.1. East Carolina: 4 by 31.3. UCF: 3 by 38.2. SMU: 2 by 37.5. Tulane: 1 by 20.8. UTEP: 4 by 33.9. Houston: 6 by 34.7
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Houston
Best efficiency game
62.5 vs Texas Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/29 | @ Houston | L 14-73 | 6 | 20 | 3.30 | 0 | — | — | 3.3 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs UTEP | W 30-29 | 4 | 13 | 3.30 | 0 | — | — | 3.3 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs Tulane | W 28-20 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | — | 2 |
| Sat 11/7 | @ SMU | L 28-31 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs UCF | L 7-49 | 3 | 11 | 3.70 | 0 | — | — | 3.7 |
| Sat 10/17 | @ East Carolina | L 13-49 | 4 | 12 | 3 | 0 | — | — | 3 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Navy | L 14-63 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | — | — | 5 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Tulsa | L 10-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/19 | @ Oklahoma State | L 24-41 | 1 | -3 | -3 | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Texas Tech | L 10-55 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 0 | — | — | 6 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ UAB | L 24-44 | 2 | 12 | 6 | 1 | — | — | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Rice
2005-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Rice | 8 | 41.7 | 3.2 | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | Rice | 0 | — | — | -8 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Rice | 51 | 44.4 | 4.4 | 51 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Rice | 57 | 36.5 | 9.7 | 6 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Rice | 84 | 37.4 | 4 | 27 |
#1 Featured game
Southern Miss
Win with 18 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
18
Primary metric
18 scrimmage yards and 4.2 usage.
#2
SMU
27
Primary metric
Win with 27 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
27 scrimmage yards and 8.8 usage.
#3
East Carolina
8
Primary metric
Loss with 8 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
8 scrimmage yards and 3.2 usage.
#4
Houston
20
Primary metric
Loss with 20 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
20 scrimmage yards and 9.7 usage.
#5
Baylor
10
Primary metric
Loss with 10 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
10 scrimmage yards and 1.6 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · Rice
57 primary output · 36.5 efficiency · 9.7 usage
47.1
#2
2009 Regular Season · Rice
46.5
84 primary · 37.4 efficiency · 4 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Rice
44.5
51 primary · 44.4 efficiency · 4.4 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2005 · Rating 0.7222
Humble · Humble, TX
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
200
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 20 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.