Usage Score
26.3
Player Dossier
2006-2009Fresno State
Seyi Ajirotutu
WR • 6'4" • El Dorado Hills, CA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Seyi Ajirotutu reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
81.2
Consistency
71.3
Season Value
68.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Fresno State
06070708080909
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Fresno State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Seyi Ajirotutu, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason · Fresno State. Seyi Ajirotutu reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Postseason
Fresno State paired 795 primary output with 83.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 81.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Postseason · Fresno State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
52.1
Efficiency
81.2
Usage
26.3
Consistency
71.3
Best Game by takeover score
Wyoming
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wyoming: 6. Unknown: 57. Wisconsin: 83. Boise State: 27. Cincinnati: 16. Hawai'i: 48. San José State: 61. New Mexico State: 64. Utah State: 124. Idaho: 45. Nevada: 38. Louisiana Tech: 56. Illinois: 52
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wyoming: 1 by 40. Unknown: 3 by 100. Wisconsin: 6 by 92.2. Boise State: 2 by 90. Cincinnati: 2 by 53.3. Hawai'i: 4 by 80. San José State: 4 by 100. New Mexico State: 3 by 100. Utah State: 7 by 100. Idaho: 4 by 75. Nevada: 4 by 63.3. Louisiana Tech: 5 by 74.7. Illinois: 4 by 86.7
Split Comparison
Wins64.3 · n=7 · +30.3 vs Losses
Losses34 · n=5 · -30.3 vs Wins
First Half42.6 · n=7 · -20.6 vs Second Half
Second Half63.2 · n=6 · +20.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Utah State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Utah State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/19 | @ Wyoming | L 28-35 | — | 1 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 12/5 | @ Illinois | W 53-52 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 1 | 25 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Louisiana Tech | W 30-28 | — | 5 | 56 | 11.2 | 11.20 | 1 | 23 |
| Sat 11/14 | @ Nevada | L 14-52 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 1 | 23 |
| Sun 11/8 | @ Idaho | W 31-21 | — | 4 | 45 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/31 | vs Utah State100 receiving yards | W 31-27 | — | 7 | 124 | 17.7 | 17.70 | 1 | 46 |
| Sun 10/25 | @ New Mexico State | W 34-3 | — | 3 | 64 | 21.3 | 21.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/18 | vs San José State | W 41-21 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sun 10/11 | @ Hawai'i | W 42-17 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Cincinnati | L 20-28 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Boise State | L 34-51 | — | 2 | 27 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 9/12 | @ Wisconsin2+ TD | L 31-34 | — | 6 | 83 | 13.8 | 13.80 | 2 | 25 |
| Sun 9/6 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 57 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 30 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Fresno State
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720072008200820092009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Fresno State | 34 | 61.1 | 10 | — |
| 2007 Postseason | Fresno State | 491 | 88 | 16.3 | 457 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Fresno State | 491 | 88 | 16.3 | 0 |
| 2008 Postseason | Fresno State | 795 | 83.5 | 21.3 | 304 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Fresno State | 795 | 83.5 | 21.3 | 0 |
| 2009 Postseason | Fresno State | 677 | 81.2 | 26.3 | -118 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Fresno State | 677 | 81.2 | 26.3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Utah State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
124
Primary metric
124 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Louisiana Tech
137
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
137 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Nevada
81
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
81 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Kansas State
76
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
76 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Rutgers
116
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
116 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Postseason · Fresno State
795 primary output · 83.5 efficiency · 21.3 usage
68.8
#2
2008 Regular Season · Fresno State
68.8
795 primary · 83.5 efficiency · 21.3 usage
#3
2009 Postseason · Fresno State
68.2
677 primary · 81.2 efficiency · 26.3 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2003 · Rating 0.8333
Orangefield · Port Arthur, TX
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2003
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,997
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.