Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season
Akron paired 273 primary output with 43.3 efficiency.
Player Stats
Joe Tuzze College Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Scrimmage yards
- 444
- Rushing yards
- 366
- Receiving yards
- 78
- Touchdowns
- 2
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Scrimmage | Rush Yds | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Akron | 1 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 37.6 |
| 2007 Regular Season | Akron | 9 | 91 | 55 | 36 | 0 | 32.4 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Akron | 4 | 75 | 67 | 8 | 0 | 43.2 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Akron | 8 | 273 | 244 | 29 | 2 | 58.9 |
Player insights
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 43.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ohio
Loss with 75 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 87.5th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Akron
Games
8
Scrimmage Yards / G
34.1
Efficiency
43.3
Usage
14.8
Consistency
50.1
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Penn State: 19. Morgan State: 9. Indiana: 0. Central Michigan: 76. Ohio: 75. Buffalo: 17. Kent State: 42. Temple: 35
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Penn State: 2 by 89.6. Morgan State: 3 by 31.3. Indiana: 1 by 0. Central Michigan: 14 by 54.9. Ohio: 17 by 45.2. Buffalo: 7 by 25.3. Kent State: 8 by 54.7. Temple: 8 by 45.6
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins25.5 · Games = 2 · -11.5 vs Losses
Losses37 · Games = 6 · +11.5 vs Wins
Next best actions
Keep exploring Joe Tuzze
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.