Usage Score
31.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009Toledo
Stephen Williams
WR • 6'5" • Houston, TX, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Stephen Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
78.7
Consistency
53.6
Season Value
63.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Toledo
06070809
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Toledo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Stephen Williams, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season · Toledo. Stephen Williams reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2007 Regular Season
Toledo paired 1,169 primary output with 90.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 78.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ball State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2009 Regular Season · Toledo
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
96.8
Efficiency
78.7
Usage
31.4
Consistency
53.6
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 185. Ohio State: 30. Florida International: 116. Ball State: 231. Western Michigan: 59. Northern Illinois: 50. Temple: 76. Miami (OH): 137. Central Michigan: 54. Eastern Michigan: 45. Bowling Green: 82
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 15 by 82.2. Ohio State: 3 by 66.7. Florida International: 6 by 100. Ball State: 10 by 100. Western Michigan: 6 by 65.6. Northern Illinois: 3 by 100. Temple: 8 by 63.3. Miami (OH): 9 by 100. Central Michigan: 6 by 60. Eastern Michigan: 5 by 60. Bowling Green: 8 by 68.3
Split Comparison
Wins110.5 · n=4 · +21.5 vs Losses
Losses89 · n=7 · -21.5 vs Wins
First Half111.8 · n=6 · +33.0 vs Second Half
Second Half78.8 · n=5 · -33.0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Ball State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Miami (OH)
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/27 | @ Bowling GreenHigh volume | L 24-38 | — | 8 | 82 | 10.3 | 10.30 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/21 | vs Eastern Michigan | W 47-21 | — | 5 | 45 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Thu 11/12 | @ Central Michigan | L 28-56 | — | 6 | 54 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Miami (OH)100 receiving yards · High volume | L 24-31 | — | 9 | 137 | 15.2 | 15.20 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 10/24 | vs TempleHigh volume | L 24-40 | — | 8 | 76 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 10/17 | vs Northern Illinois | W 20-19 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Western Michigan | L 26-58 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/3 | @ Ball State100 receiving yards · High volume | W 37-30 | — | 10 | 231 | 23.1 | 23.10 | 2 | 56 |
| Sat 9/26 | @ Florida International100 receiving yards | W 41-31 | — | 6 | 116 | 19.3 | 19.30 | 0 | 28 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Ohio State | L 0-38 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 9/5 | @ Purdue100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-52 | — | 15 | 185 | 12.3 | 12.30 | 2 | 42 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Toledo
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
2006200720082009
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Toledo | 87 | 58.9 | 5.6 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,169 | 90.8 | 32.5 | 1,082 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Toledo | 781 | 71.6 | 31.3 | -388 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Toledo | 1,065 | 78.7 | 31.4 | 284 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Akron
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
136
Primary metric
136 receiving yards with a 90.7 efficiency score.
#2
Ball State
231
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
231 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Ball State
135
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Buffalo
172
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 76.4 efficiency score.
#5
Eastern Michigan
150
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
150 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2007 Regular Season · Toledo
1,169 primary output · 90.8 efficiency · 32.5 usage
74.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · Toledo
63.6
1,065 primary · 78.7 efficiency · 31.4 usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · Toledo
59.6
781 primary · 71.6 efficiency · 31.3 usage
Milestones
12
100+ receiving yards
11
8+ catch outings
6
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2004 · Rating 0.7444
Ganado · Ganado, TX
- Committed To
- TCU
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2004
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
3,102
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 41 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.