Usage Score
6.4
Player Dossier
2006-2009Cincinnati
TE • 6'4" • St. Louis, MO, USA
Kazeem Alli reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
6.4
Efficiency
75.4
Consistency
67.5
Season Value
62.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Cincinnati
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kazeem Alli, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason · Cincinnati. Kazeem Alli reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason
Cincinnati paired 156 primary output with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2009 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 75.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
7
Receiving Yards / G
22.3
Efficiency
75.4
Usage
6.4
Consistency
67.5
Best Game by takeover score
Florida
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Florida: 6. Rutgers: 22. Oregon State: 38. Miami (OH): 16. Syracuse: 23. UConn: 40. Illinois: 11
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida: 1 by 40. Rutgers: 1 by 100. Oregon State: 3 by 84.4. Miami (OH): 2 by 53.3. Syracuse: 2 by 76.7. UConn: 2 by 100. Illinois: 1 by 73.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
7 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UConn
Best efficiency game
100 vs UConn
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Cincinnati
2006-2009
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 81 | 75.3 | 8.8 | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 54 | 100 | 4.1 | -27 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 124 | 64.3 | 5.6 | 70 |
| 2009 Postseason | Cincinnati | 156 | 75.4 | 6.4 | 32 |
| 2009 Regular Season | Cincinnati | 156 | 75.4 | 6.4 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
UConn
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40
Primary metric
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Akron
29
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
29 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
UConn
34
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
34 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Rutgers
24
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
24 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
23
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2009 Postseason · Cincinnati
156 primary output · 75.4 efficiency · 6.4 usage
62.3
#2
2009 Regular Season · Cincinnati
62.3
156 primary · 75.4 efficiency · 6.4 usage
#3
2007 Regular Season · Cincinnati
53.6
54 primary · 100 efficiency · 4.1 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2004 · Rating 0.7444
Cloverleaf · Lodi, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
415
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Kazeem Alli quick answers
Recruiting profile
2-star recruit