Player Stats

Domenic Natale College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
220
Passing yards
249
Touchdowns
1

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2005 Regular SeasonMichigan State1303033.9
2008 Regular SeasonRutgers42936-7024.8
2009 Regular SeasonRutgers5188213-25152.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Regular Season

Rutgers paired 188 primary output with 54.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Regular Season role shape

pass-led usage with 54.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value is trending up

2009 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Michigan State, Rutgers.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas Southern

Win with 14 yards of offense and 100 efficiency. It landed in the 40th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Regular Season · Rutgers

Games

5

Primary Metric / G

37.6

Efficiency

54.7

Usage

6.9

Consistency

39.2

Best Game by takeover score

Texas Southern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Cincinnati: 96. Howard: 2. Florida International: 51. Maryland: 25. Texas Southern: 14

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Cincinnati: 16 by 35.4. Howard: 2 by 30. Florida International: 3 by 67.5. Maryland: 17 by 40.6. Texas Southern: 1 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins23 · Games = 4 · -73 vs Losses
Losses96 · Games = 1 · +73 vs Wins