Player Stats

Kevin Harris College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
935
Rushing yards
785
Receiving yards
150
Touchdowns
12

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2006 Regular SeasonWake Forest93993936674.1
2007 Regular SeasonWake Forest5856025126.9
2008 PostseasonWake Forest717213636044.4
2008 Regular SeasonWake Forest71074067244.4
2009 Regular SeasonWake Forest617215616349.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season

Wake Forest paired 399 primary output with 63.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 42.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Win with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Regular Season · Wake Forest

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

28.7

Efficiency

42.8

Usage

11.1

Consistency

78.5

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Baylor: 23. Stanford: 39. Elon: 23. Georgia Tech: 4. Florida State: 38. Duke: 45

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Baylor: 4 by 59.9. Stanford: 8 by 50.8. Elon: 5 by 47.9. Georgia Tech: 3 by 8.7. Florida State: 9 by 44. Duke: 9 by 45.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins35.7 · Games = 3 · +14.0 vs Losses
Losses21.7 · Games = 3 · -14.0 vs Wins