Player Stats

Sean Canfield College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Total offense
5,657
Passing yards
5,970
Touchdowns
41

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTotal OffensePass YdsRush YdsTDOverall
2006 Regular SeasonOregon State7325335-10329.2
2007 PostseasonOregon State105568-13144
2007 Regular SeasonOregon State101,4911,593-102844
2008 Regular SeasonOregon State4675703-28643.4
2009 PostseasonOregon State131691681166.5
2009 Regular SeasonOregon State132,9423,103-1612266.5

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Oregon State paired 3,111 primary output with 58.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

pass-led usage with 58.5 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Portland State

Win with 158 yards of offense and 90.9 efficiency. It landed in the 7.7th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Oregon State

Games

13

Primary Metric / G

239.3

Efficiency

58.5

Usage

12.3

Consistency

80.1

Best Game by takeover score

Portland State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. BYU: 169. Portland State: 158. UNLV: 172. Cincinnati: 204. Arizona: 292. Arizona State: 210. Stanford: 262. USC: 306. UCLA: 300. California: 342. Washington: 169. Washington State: 231. Oregon: 296

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. BYU: 42 by 44.4. Portland State: 11 by 90.9. UNLV: 35 by 58.5. Cincinnati: 50 by 50. Arizona: 56 by 50.7. Arizona State: 32 by 51.7. Stanford: 36 by 61.1. USC: 47 by 58.4. UCLA: 37 by 62.1. California: 44 by 59.3. Washington: 34 by 56.4. Washington State: 30 by 57.1. Oregon: 40 by 59.4

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins230.5 · Games = 8 · -22.9 vs Losses
Losses253.4 · Games = 5 · +22.9 vs Wins