Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2005-2005Pittsburgh
Rashad Jennings
—
Impact contributor
Rashad Jennings shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
4.2
Season Value
52.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
05
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- Pittsburgh
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Cincinnati
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Rashad Jennings, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Pittsburgh. Rashad Jennings shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Rashad Jennings is listed for Pittsburgh. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Pittsburgh paired 1 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Game with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2005 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
Games
8
Primary Metric / G
0.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
4.2
Best Game by takeover score
Toledo
Not enough games exist for the full explorer. The summary cards stay available so the season still reads clearly.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Not enough games are available for a full trend line yet.
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
1 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
— vs Toledo
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 10/6 | @ Toledo | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 24 | 160 | 6.70 | 2 | 63 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Pittsburgh
2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
2005
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | Pittsburgh | 1 | — | — | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Cincinnati
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Toledo
2
Primary metric
Game with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
West Virginia
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
UConn
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Louisville
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Pittsburgh
1 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
52.1
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2007 · Rating 0.7667
Aldine MacArthur · Houston, TX
- Committed To
- Washington State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2007
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.