Player Stats

Jordan Shipley College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
3,191
Receptions
248
Touchdowns
36

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2006 PostseasonTexas12111039.9
2006 Regular SeasonTexas1215218439.9
2007 PostseasonTexas9644059.2
2007 Regular SeasonTexas921373559.2
2008 PostseasonTexas131078075
2008 Regular SeasonTexas13799821275
2009 PostseasonTexas1410122284.3
2009 Regular SeasonTexas141061,3631384.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2009 Postseason

Texas paired 1,485 primary output with 73.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2009 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 73.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2009 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UCF

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2009 Postseason · Texas

Games

14

Receiving Yards / G

106.1

Efficiency

73.3

Usage

32.9

Consistency

63.9

Best Game by takeover score

UCF

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011121314

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 122. UL Monroe: 180. Wyoming: 61. Texas Tech: 73. UTEP: 122. Colorado: 147. Oklahoma: 22. Missouri: 108. Oklahoma State: 64. UCF: 273. Baylor: 46. Kansas: 108. Texas A&M: 88. Nebraska: 71

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 10 by 81.3. UL Monroe: 8 by 100. Wyoming: 7 by 58.1. Texas Tech: 11 by 44.2. UTEP: 10 by 81.3. Colorado: 11 by 89.1. Oklahoma: 4 by 36.7. Missouri: 7 by 100. Oklahoma State: 6 by 71.1. UCF: 11 by 100. Baylor: 6 by 51.1. Kansas: 10 by 72. Texas A&M: 8 by 73.3. Nebraska: 7 by 67.6

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins104.8 · Games = 13 · -17.2 vs Losses
Losses122 · Games = 1 · +17.2 vs Wins