Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2005Minnesota
—
Gary Russell shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
67
Season Value
83.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Minnesota
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Gary Russell, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season · Minnesota. Gary Russell shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Gary Russell is listed for Minnesota. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2005 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2005 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Primary Metric / G
1.6
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
67
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia: 0. Tulsa: 2. Colorado State: 2. Florida Atlantic: 2. Purdue: 3. Penn State: 0. Michigan: 0. Wisconsin: 2. Ohio State: 2. Indiana: 3. Michigan State: 2. Iowa: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Indiana
Best efficiency game
— vs Virginia
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | vs Virginia | L 31-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 22 | 85 | 3.90 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ Iowa | L 28-52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 17 | 78 | 4.60 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Michigan State | W 41-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 85 | 4.50 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Indiana | W 42-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 28 | 188 | 6.70 | 3 | 28 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Ohio State | L 31-45 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | — | 15 | 50 | 3.30 | 2 | 12 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Wisconsin | L 34-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 19 | 139 | 7.30 | 2 | 37 |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Michigan | W 23-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 18 | 128 | 7.10 | 0 | 61 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Penn State | L 14-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 53 | 6.60 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 9/24 | vs Purdue | W 42-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 16 | 75 | 4.70 | 2 | 10 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 46-7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 11 | 116 | 10.50 | 2 | 47 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Colorado State | W 56-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 66 | 9.40 | 2 | 28 |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Tulsa | W 41-10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 6 | 67 | 11.20 | 2 | 35 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2004-2005
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Minnesota | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Minnesota | 19 | — | — | 19 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3
Primary metric
3 primary-metric impact.
#2
Purdue
3
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
3 primary-metric impact.
#3
Michigan State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#4
Ohio State
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#5
Wisconsin
2
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2004 Regular Season · Minnesota
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2005 Regular Season · Minnesota
83.5
19 primary · — efficiency · — usage
8
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2008 · Rating 0.8067
Foothill · Pleasanton, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.