Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2008-2008SMU
Andrew McKinney
—
Impact contributor
Andrew McKinney shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
3.3
Season Value
51.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · SMU
08
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 1
- Program Path
- SMU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew McKinney, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season · SMU. Andrew McKinney shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Andrew McKinney is listed for SMU. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2008 Regular Season
SMU paired 1 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UCF
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2008 Regular Season · SMU
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.1
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
3.3
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Rice: 0. Unknown: 0. Texas Tech: 0. UCF: 1. Tulsa: 0. Houston: 0. Navy: 0. Memphis: 0. UTEP: 0. Southern Miss: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Losses11.1 · Games = 9
First Half20 · Games = 5 · +0.2 vs Second Half
Second Half0 · Games = 5 · -0.2 vs First Half
All Games10 · Games = 10
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
UCF
Best efficiency game
— vs Southern Miss
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/29 | vs Southern Miss | L 12-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 17 | 5.70 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/16 | @ UTEP | L 10-36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 11/8 | vs Memphis | L 26-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 25 | 3.60 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/25 | @ Navy | L 7-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | -1 | -1 | 0 | 0 |
| Sun 10/19 | vs Houston | L 38-44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 41 | 5.10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Tulsa | L 31-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 9 | 38 | 4.20 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 10/4 | @ UCF | L 17-31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 5 | 0.60 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 9/13 | @ Texas Tech | L 7-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 17 | 8.50 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Rice | L 27-56 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 10 | 3.30 | 0 | 5 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
SMU
2008
Opening stop
Season Progression
2008
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2008 Regular Season | SMU | 1 | — | — | — |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UCF
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Southern Miss
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#3
UTEP
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
Memphis
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Navy
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2008 Regular Season · SMU
1 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
51.7
Milestones
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2009 · Rating 0.9664
East St. Louis · East St. Louis, IL
- Committed To
- Illinois
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2009
Career Facts
1
Career teams
1
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 1 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.