Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Player Dossier
2005-2008UTEP
—
Jamar Hunt shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
Reliability
7
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
50
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · UTEP
Snapshot
Jamar Hunt, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2005 Regular Season · UTEP. Jamar Hunt shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | TD | Primary | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | UTEP | 7 | 0 | 2 | 54.8 |
| 2006 Regular Season | UTEP | 10 | 0 | 2 | 53.4 |
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 6 | 0 | 1 | 27.8 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 10 | 0 | 2 | 53.4 |
Related Context
Jamar Hunt is listed for UTEP. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
UTEP paired 2 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2008 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulsa
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Tulsa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 0. Texas: 0. New Mexico State: 0. UCF: 1. Southern Miss: 0. Tulane: 0. Tulsa: 1. Rice: 0. Louisiana: 0. Houston: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Tulsa
Best efficiency game
— vs Houston
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/22 | @ Houston | L 37-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/9 | @ Louisiana | W 37-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 11/2 | vs Rice | L 44-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/19 | @ Tulsa | L 35-77 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/12 | vs Tulane | W 24-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/4 | @ Southern Miss | W 40-37 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/28 | vs UCF | W 58-13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/21 | vs New Mexico State | L 33-34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 9/7 | vs Texas | L 13-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 8/28 | @ Buffalo | L 17-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
UTEP
2005-2008
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 Regular Season | UTEP | 2 | — | — | — |
| 2006 Regular Season | UTEP | 2 | — | — | 0 |
| 2007 Regular Season | UTEP | 1 | — | — | -1 |
| 2008 Regular Season | UTEP | 2 | — | — | 1 |
#1 Featured game
vs Marshall
Week 8 · W 31-3 · Conference game
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
@ New Mexico State
Week 1 · W 34-17
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
vs Tulane
Week 7 · W 34-20 · Conference game
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
@ San Diego State
Week 1 · W 34-27
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
vs Houston
Week 9 · L 31-34 · Conference game
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by Season Value
2005 Regular Season · UTEP
2 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
54.8
#2
2006 Regular Season · UTEP
53.4
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2008 Regular Season · UTEP
53.4
2 primary · — efficiency · — usage
7
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.