Usage / Role
—
Role sample still building
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2004-2006Temple
Tim Brown
—
Impact contributor
Tim Brown shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Impact Production
—
Production sample still building
lowelite
Reliability
11
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
54
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2004 Regular Season · Temple
040506
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 3
- Program Path
- Temple
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
3★
- Committed To
- Colorado
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2010
Tim Brown, player. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2004 Regular Season · Temple. Tim Brown shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Quick Answers
Tim Brown quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Temple · Position unavailable
- Career Touchdowns
- 0
- Tracked sample
- 3 unique seasons · 3 entries · 18 games
- Best season
- 2004 Regular Season · Temple
- Top game
- Pittsburgh
- Recruit profile
- 3-star · Mountain Pointe · Colorado
- High school pipeline
- Mountain Pointe · 23 FBS recruits · 0 drafted players
- Latest roster
- Class 2006
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | TD | Primary | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Temple | 9 | 0 | 3 | 55.6 |
| 2005 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2006 Regular Season | Temple | 9 | 0 | 3 | 55.6 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Tim Brown
Tim Brown is listed for Temple. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2004 Regular Season
Temple paired 3 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2006 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2006 Regular Season · Temple
Games
9
Primary Metric / G
0.3
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Buffalo: 0. Louisville: 0. Vanderbilt: 1. Kent State: 1. Northern Illinois: 0. Bowling Green: 0. Central Michigan: 1. Penn State: 0. Navy: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0 · Games = 1 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 8 · +0.4 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
— vs Navy
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | @ Navy | L 6-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 24 | 2 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Penn State | L 0-47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 21 | 1.50 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Central Michigan | L 26-42 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 100.0 | 1 | 0 | — | 23 | 101 | 4.40 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Bowling Green | W 28-14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 21 | 104 | 5 | 0 | 40 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Northern Illinois | L 21-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 23 | 1.90 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Kent State | L 17-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 12 | 76 | 6.30 | 1 | 31 |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Vanderbilt | L 14-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 31 | 147 | 4.70 | 1 | 78 |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Louisville | L 0-62 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 14 | 32 | 2.30 | 0 | 18 |
| Thu 8/31 | @ Buffalo | L 3-9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 20 | 82 | 4.10 | 0 | 15 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Temple
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
200420052006
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Temple | 3 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Temple | 0 | — | — | -3 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Temple | 3 | — | — | 3 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
vs Pittsburgh
Week 7 · L 22-27 · Conference game
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
vs Bowling Green
Week 6 · L 16-70
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
@ Maryland
Week 3 · L 22-45
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
vs Central Michigan
Week 10 · L 26-42
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
vs Kent State
Week 6 · L 17-28
1
Touchdowns
100 takeover
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2004 Regular Season · Temple
3 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
55.6
#2
2006 Regular Season · Temple
55.6
3 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2005 Regular Season · Temple
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
6
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Tim Brown
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.