Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2006-2007Tulsa
Cody Madison
—
Impact contributor
Cody Madison shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Efficiency
—
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
53.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Tulsa
0607
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Tulsa
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Cody Madison, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season · Tulsa. Cody Madison shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Cody Madison is listed for Tulsa. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2006 Regular Season
Tulsa paired 1 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2007 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2007 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rice
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2007 Regular Season · Tulsa
Games
5
Primary Metric / G
0.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 0. SMU: 0. Houston: 0. Army: 0. Rice: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Scatter view is hidden because this season does not have enough game-to-game variety yet.
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins20 · Games = 5
First Half0 · Games = 3 · -0.5 vs Second Half
Second Half50 · Games = 2 · +0.5 vs First Half
All Games20 · Games = 5
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Rice
Best efficiency game
— vs Rice
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Tulsa
2006-2007
Opening stop
Season Progression
20062007
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2006 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2007 Regular Season | Tulsa | 1 | — | — | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Tulane
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Rice
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
SMU
0
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#4
Army
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Houston
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2006 Regular Season · Tulsa
1 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
75
#2
2007 Regular Season · Tulsa
53.4
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2013 · Rating 0.7783
West Port · Ocala, FL
- Committed To
- Akron
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 7 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.