Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2006Minnesota
—
Matt Spaeth shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
12.1
Season Value
56.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Minnesota
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Matt Spaeth, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Minnesota. Matt Spaeth shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Matt Spaeth is listed for Minnesota. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Minnesota paired 4 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2006 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2006 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Iowa
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
0.4
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
12.1
Best Game by takeover score
Iowa
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kent State: 0. California: 0. Temple: 0. Purdue: 1. Michigan: 0. Penn State: 1. Wisconsin: 0. Unknown: 0. Indiana: 1. Michigan State: 0. Iowa: 1
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Iowa
Best efficiency game
— vs Iowa
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/18 | vs Iowa | W 34-24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Michigan State | W 31-18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Indiana | W 63-26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Wisconsin | L 12-48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Penn State | L 27-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/1 | vs Michigan | L 14-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Purdue | L 21-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Temple | W 62-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ California | L 17-42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | @ Kent State | W 44-0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Minnesota
2004-2006
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Minnesota | 4 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Minnesota | 4 | — | — | 0 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Minnesota | 4 | — | — | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
2
Primary metric
2 primary-metric impact.
#2
Colorado State
2
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
2 primary-metric impact.
#3
Michigan State
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#5
Wisconsin
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Minnesota
4 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
56.7
#2
2006 Regular Season · Minnesota
56.1
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2004 Regular Season · Minnesota
54.8
4 primary · — efficiency · — usage
10
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2017 · Rating 0.7667
Abilene · Abilene, KS
Career Facts
1
Career teams
3
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 3 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.