Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 3,798 primary output with 57.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2022 Postseason | Mississippi State | 13 | 268 | 261 | 7 | 1 | 70.1 |
| 2022 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 13 | 3,530 | 3,702 | -172 | 34 | 70.1 |
| 2023 Regular Season | Mississippi State | 8 | 1,613 | 1,626 | -13 | 13 | 46.6 |
| 2024 Regular Season | Washington | 11 | 2,379 | 2,458 | -79 | 14 | 57.7 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2022 Postseason
Mississippi State paired 3,798 primary output with 57.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2024 Regular Season role shape
pass-led usage with 60.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2024 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Mississippi State, Washington.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win with 262 yards of offense and 73.4 efficiency. It landed in the 81.8th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Primary Metric / G
216.3
Efficiency
60.2
Usage
11.5
Consistency
82.2
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Weber State: 234. Eastern Michigan: 254. Washington State: 303. Northwestern: 240. Rutgers: 311. Michigan: 252. Iowa: 180. Indiana: 181. USC: 262. Penn State: 47. UCLA: 115
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Weber State: 29 by 64.3. Eastern Michigan: 27 by 66.1. Washington State: 37 by 64.7. Northwestern: 35 by 65.5. Rutgers: 38 by 67. Michigan: 34 by 56.9. Iowa: 39 by 50.2. Indiana: 31 by 51.8. USC: 39 by 73.4. Penn State: 15 by 46. UCLA: 21 by 56.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.