Usage Score
—
Player Dossier
2004-2008Akron
—
Andrew Johnson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Usage Score
—
Efficiency
—
Consistency
6.7
Season Value
53.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Miami
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Andrew Johnson, player. Best season Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season · Miami. Andrew Johnson shows a productive multi-phase profile across the tracked sample.
Andrew Johnson is listed for Miami and Akron. Detailed college production data is limited on CFB Track.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2005 Regular Season
Miami paired 0 primary output with — efficiency.
Supporting note
2008 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with — efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2008 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Miami, Akron.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Win with a strong all-around stat line. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Primary Metric / G
0.2
Efficiency
—
Usage
—
Consistency
6.7
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 0. Syracuse: 0. Ball State: 1. Army: 0. Cincinnati: 0. Eastern Michigan: 0. Toledo: 1. Buffalo: 0. Ohio: 0. Temple: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Touchdowns
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
— vs Temple
| Result | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/28 | @ Temple | L 6-27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 11 | 2.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Sat 11/22 | @ Ohio | L 42-49 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 4 | 11 | 2.80 | 0 | 6 |
| Fri 11/14 | vs Buffalo | L 40-43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Thu 11/6 | vs Toledo | W 47-30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 54 | 7.70 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 10/18 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 42-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 5 | 8 | 1.60 | 0 | 4 |
| Sat 9/27 | vs Cincinnati | L 15-17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 8 | 33 | 4.10 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/20 | @ Army | W 22-3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 10 | 55 | 5.50 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 9/13 | vs Ball State | L 24-41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 50 | 7.10 | 1 | 26 |
| Sat 9/6 | @ Syracuse | W 42-28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7 | 39 | 5.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 8/30 | @ Wisconsin | L 17-38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 12 | 4 | 0 | 6 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami
2004-2006
Opening stop
Akron
2008
Final stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2004 Regular Season | Miami | 1 | — | — | — |
| 2005 Regular Season | Miami | 0 | — | — | -1 |
| 2006 Regular Season | Miami | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2008 Regular Season | Akron | 2 | — | — | 2 |
#1 Featured game
Wake Forest
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1
Primary metric
1 primary-metric impact.
#2
Toledo
1
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#3
Ball State
1
Primary metric
Loss with a strong all-around stat line.
1 primary-metric impact.
#4
Georgia Tech
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#5
Houston
0
Primary metric
Win with a strong all-around stat line.
0 primary-metric impact.
#1 Season by value score
2005 Regular Season · Miami
0 primary output · — efficiency · — usage
100
#2
2006 Regular Season · Miami
100
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
#3
2004 Regular Season · Miami
54.2
1 primary · — efficiency · — usage
3
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2004 · Rating 0.9713
North Hills · Pittsburgh, PA
Career Facts
2
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
0
Career Touchdowns
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 18 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.