Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Charlie Weis
Charlie Weis: 64th pct vs Jim Leavitt: 58th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Charlie Weis
Charlie Weis: 64th pct vs Jim Leavitt: 58th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Charlie Weis
Charlie Weis: 86th pct vs Jim Leavitt: 79th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Narrow edgeEdge: Charlie Weis
Charlie Weis: 10th pct vs Jim Leavitt: 7th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Charlie Weis vs Jim Leavitt
Charlie Weis: 0 titles vs Jim Leavitt: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Charlie Weis vs Jim Leavitt
Charlie Weis: 10 seasons vs Jim Leavitt: 10 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Jim Leavitt
Jim Leavitt: 63.0% vs Charlie Weis: 45.6%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Charlie Weis and Jim Leavitt look similar in overall strength.
Charlie Weis and Jim Leavitt look similar in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Charlie Weis
Above average
Above average
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Jim Leavitt
Above average
Above average
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-3 • SRS 20.8 • SP Overall 21.8
Win %
75.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
41.3 / 19.5
Finish
#9
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Jim Leavitt
Nearest year 2005 • South Florida
6-6 • SRS 8.1 • SP Overall 2.3
Charlie Weis holds a 12.7-point SRS edge at this point.
Offense gap: +18.9 SP offense
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charlie Weis | |||||
| Notre Dame | 2005-2009 | 5 | 35-27 | 6.8Best quality | 20.8Highest peak |
| Kansas | 2012-2014 | 3 | 6-22 | -9.0 | -7.5 |
| Jim Leavitt | |||||
| South Florida | 2000-2009 | 10 | 75-44 | 0.4 | 17.3Longest stop |
Closing takeaway
41-49 • 45.6% • 8 seasons • 0 titles
-11.8 worst-season SRS.
Best Season
Notre Dame 2005
SRS 20.8
Lowest SRS Season
Kansas 2013
SRS -11.8
Biggest Improvement
Notre Dame 2008
9.9 SRS
75-44 • 63.0% • 10 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
South Florida 2007
SRS 17.3
Lowest SRS Season
South Florida 2000
SRS -26.3
Biggest Improvement
South Florida 2001
28.0 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.