Career Quality
SimilarSimilar: Steve Campbell vs Dixon Foster
Steve Campbell: 12th pct vs Dixon Foster: 11th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Steve CampbellDixon Foster
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Steve Campbell
Steve Campbell: 18th pct vs Dixon Foster: 14th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge: Steve Campbell
Steve Campbell: 66th pct
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Dixon Foster vs Steve Campbell
Dixon Foster: 0 titles vs Steve Campbell: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Dixon Foster vs Steve Campbell
Dixon Foster: 3 seasons vs Steve Campbell: 3 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
SimilarSimilar: Dixon Foster vs Steve Campbell
Dixon Foster: 26.5% vs Steve Campbell: 25.7%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Steve Campbell sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeSteve Campbell sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Steve Campbell
Lower end
- Raw avg SP Overall
- -16.4
- Percentile
- 12th pct
Lower end
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Dixon Foster
Insufficient sample
- Raw avg SP Overall
- —
- Percentile
- —
Insufficient sample
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Steve CampbellDixon Foster
EliteStrongAverageLean
1917Actual season year • SRS range -22.1 to -8.52021
Active comparison point
Steve Campbell • 2020
2020 South Alabama
Best seasonBiggest improvement4-7 • SRS -8.5 • SP Overall -11.3
Win %
36.4%
YoY SRS
+8.7
SP Off / Def
22.5 / 33.7
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Dixon Foster
Nearest year 1919 • South Carolina
1-7-1 • SRS -20.7 • SP Overall —
Steve Campbell holds a 12.2-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Campbell | |||||
| South Alabama | 2018-2020 | 3 | 9-26 | -15.9 | -8.5Highest peak |
| Dixon Foster | |||||
| South Carolina | 1917-1917 | 1 | 3-5 | -10.8Best quality | -10.8 |
| South Carolina | 1919-1919 | 1 | 1-7-1 | -20.7 | -20.7 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Steadier arc
Full profile →Steve Campbell
9-26 • 25.7% • 3 seasons • 0 titles
66th pct steadiness score.
Best Season
South Alabama 2020
SRS -8.5
Lowest SRS Season
South Alabama 2018
SRS -22.1
Biggest Improvement
South Alabama 2020
8.7 SRS
Similar overall level
Full profile →Dixon Foster
4-12-1 • 26.5% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
This matchup stays tight across the headline comparison signals.
Best Season
South Carolina 1917
SRS -10.8
Lowest SRS Season
South Carolina 1919
SRS -20.7
Biggest Improvement
South Carolina 1919
-9.9 SRS