Career Quality
Narrow edgeEdge: Milton Daniel
Milton Daniel: 53rd pct vs Frank Maile: 45th pct
Percentile score against all tracked coaches.
Coaches Compare
Compare coach careers on the same scale.
See top-line edges, side-by-side profiles, overlaid career arcs, and school-stop comparisons in one matchup view.
Frank MaileMilton Daniel
2 of 4 slots filled. Comparison is active.
Top-line verdicts
Who leads, and by how much
Peak Score
Narrow edgeEdge: Frank Maile
Frank Maile: 71st pct vs Milton Daniel: 65th pct
Percentile peak score derived from each coach's best season.
Consistency
Decisive edgeEdge unavailable
Not enough data
Percentile steadiness score across season-to-season performance.
National Championships
SimilarSimilar: Frank Maile vs Milton Daniel
Frank Maile: 0 titles vs Milton Daniel: 0 titles
Raw championship seasons from the curated national-title dataset.
Longevity
SimilarSimilar: Frank Maile vs Milton Daniel
Frank Maile: 3 seasons vs Milton Daniel: 2 seasons
Raw career span based on first and last tracked season.
Career Win Percentage
Decisive edgeEdge: Milton Daniel
Milton Daniel: 76.3% vs Frank Maile: 50.0%
Raw career win rate, not a normalized score.
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Frank Maile sets the reference point in overall strength.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeFrank Maile sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Frank Maile
Mixed
- Raw avg SP Overall
- -1.3
- Percentile
- 52th pct
Mixed
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Milton Daniel
Insufficient sample
- Raw avg SP Overall
- —
- Percentile
- —
Insufficient sample
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Career Arc Overlay
Overlay the same SRS scale to compare where each career climbed faster, held steadier, peaked higher, or dipped harder.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Frank MaileMilton Daniel
EliteStrongAverageLean
1916Actual season year • SRS range -20.6 to 13.92020
Active comparison point
Frank Maile • 2018
2018 Utah State
Best season1-0 • SRS 13.9 • SP Overall 14.2
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
36.3 / 22.5
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Compared against the nearest season year point for the other selected coach.
Milton Daniel
Nearest year 1917 • TCU
8-2 • SRS 11.5 • SP Overall —
Frank Maile holds a 2.4-point SRS edge at this point.
Tenure comparison
Compare school stops, duration, average level, and peak seasons across each coach's path.
| School | Years | Seasons | Record | Avg SRS | Peak |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frank Maile | |||||
| Utah State | 2018-2018 | 1 | 1-0 | 13.9Best quality | 13.9Highest peak |
| Utah State | 2020-2020 | 1 | 1-2 | -19.2 | -19.2 |
| Milton Daniel | |||||
| TCU | 1916-1917 | 2 | 14-4-1 | -4.5 | 11.5 |
Closing takeaway
What separates these careers at the finish
Higher ceiling
Full profile →Frank Maile
2-2 • 50.0% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
13.9 peak SRS at the top end.
Best Season
Utah State 2018
SRS 13.9
Worst Season
Utah State 2020
SRS -19.2
Biggest Improvement
Utah State 2020
-33.1 SRS
Higher career quality
Full profile →Milton Daniel
14-4-1 • 76.3% • 2 seasons • 0 titles
53rd pct career-quality score.
Best Season
TCU 1917
SRS 11.5
Worst Season
TCU 1916
SRS -20.6
Biggest Improvement
TCU 1917
32.1 SRS
Program impact deltas are hidden because at least one selected coach lacks a credible pre-tenure baseline.