Top 25
13-21
- Games
- 34
- Win rate
- 38.2%
Coach Profile
1997-2008 • Clemson, Tulane
2 schools coached, anchored by Clemson.
Tommy Bowden coached 12 seasons, won 64.8%, and posted an average SRS of 9.8. Best season: 2007 Clemson. The profile was offense-first with a very steady week-to-week shape. 2 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Clemson
Offense-First profile with 2 program stops and a peak score of 72.5.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-4 • SRS 14.6 • SP Overall 16.2
Win %
69.2%
YoY SRS
+3.2
SP Off / Def
31.6 / 15.2
Finish
#21
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
13-21
Top 10
3-7
Top 5
1-2
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Clemson
1999-2008 • 10 seasons
Avg SRS 10.1 • Win % 61.5%
Tulane
1997-1998 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 8.6 • Win % 81.8%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Tommy Bowden sets the reference point in overall strength.
Tommy Bowden sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Tommy Bowden
Elite
Elite
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
1999-2008 • 72-45
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.2 during vs 6.0 baseline
+1.2
Avg SRS
Higher is better
10.1 during vs 3.6 baseline
+6.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
13.2 during vs 4.3 baseline
+8.9
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
40.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+40.0%
1997-1998 • 18-4
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
9.0 during vs 2.0 baseline
+7.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
8.6 during vs -12.7 baseline
+21.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
11.0 during vs -15.1 baseline
+26.1
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
50.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+50.0%
High Points
Best Season
Clemson 2007
9-4 • SRS 14.6
Biggest Improvement
Clemson 2003
9-4 • 11.2 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Tulane 1998
11-0 • SP Off 47.1
Best Defensive Season
Clemson 2006
8-5 • SP Def 13.7
Setbacks
Worst Season
Clemson 2002
7-6 • SRS 3.3
Biggest Drop
Clemson 2004
6-5 • -7.8 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Clemson | 2008 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 50.0% | #9 | — | 8.4 | 12.8 | 27.0 | 14.2 | -6.2 | -19.2% |
| Clemson | 2007 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #21 | 14.6 | 16.2 | 31.6 | 15.2 | +3.2 | +7.7% |
| Clemson | 2006 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #18 | — | 11.4 | 16.7 | 31.5 | 13.7 | +0.4 | -5.1% |
| Clemson | 2005 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | #21 | 11.0 | 12.9 | 31.1 | 18.2 | +4.3 | +12.1% |
| Clemson | 2004 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | #15 | — | 6.7 | 7.1 | 28.6 | 22.7 | -7.8 | -14.7% |
| Clemson | 2003 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #22 | 14.5 | 19.3 | 37.6 | 19.8 | +11.2 | +15.4% |
| Clemson | 2002 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 3.3 | 7.4 | 34.7 | 29.4 | -2.2 | -4.5% |
| Clemson | 2001 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | #19 | — | 5.5 | 7.5 | 39.3 | 33.9 | -7.4 | -16.7% |
| Clemson | 2000 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | #17 | #16 | 12.9 | 15.7 | 41.1 | 28.7 | +0.4 | +25.0% |
| Clemson | 1999 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | 12.5 | 16.0 | 35.9 | 22.1 | +0.3 | -50.0% |
| Tulane | 1998 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | #7 | 12.2 | 15.4 | 47.1 | 35.6 | +7.2 | +36.4% |
| Tulane | 1997 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% | — | — | 5.0 | 6.6 | 35.7 | 31.4 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS 10.9 • Peak SRS 20.8 • 14 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 4.9
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 1.2
Avg SRS 7.3 • Peak SRS 15.4 • 12 seasons
Best finish #19 • Volatility 5.0
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 0.0
Avg SRS 13.0 • Peak SRS 19.9 • 8 seasons
Best finish #6 • Volatility 3.7
Open profile →avg SRS within 1.2 • volatility within 0.1
Avg SRS 11.0 • Peak SRS 16.7 • 8 seasons
Best finish #14 • Volatility 3.9
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 0.9
Avg SRS 6.2 • Peak SRS 10.0 • 10 seasons
Best finish #16 • Volatility 4.6
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 9.4 • Peak SRS 15.7 • 4 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 5.0
Open profile →