Top 25
4-1-1
- Games
- 6
- Win rate
- 75.0%
Coach Profile
1919-1938 • Lafayette, Pittsburgh
2 schools coached, anchored by Pittsburgh.
Jock Sutherland coached 20 seasons, won 81.2%, and posted an average SRS of 17.4. Best season: 1921 Lafayette. The profile was balanced with a mostly steady profile. 2 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Pittsburgh
Balanced profile with 2 program stops and a peak score of 95.5.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-0 • SRS 28.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
+18.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
4-1-1
Top 10
2-0-1
Top 5
1-0-1
| 1938 Regular Week 7 | Pittsburgh | Fordham | #13 | W24-13 |
| 1938 Regular Week 5 | Pittsburgh | Wisconsin | #12 | W26-6 |
| 1937 Regular Week 5 | Pittsburgh | Fordham | #4 | T0-0 |
| 1936 Regular Week 6 | Pittsburgh | Notre Dame | #9 | W26-0 |
| 1936 Regular Week 5 | Pittsburgh | Duquesne | #20 | L0-7 |
| 1936 Postseason Week 1 | Pittsburgh | Washington | #5 | W21-0 |
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Pittsburgh
1924-1938 • 15 seasons
Avg SRS 17.4 • Win % 81.8%
Lafayette
1919-1923 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS 17.5 • Win % 79.1%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jock Sutherland
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
1924-1938 • 111-20-12
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.4 during vs 6.0 baseline
+1.4
Avg SRS
Higher is better
17.4 during vs 19.6 baseline
-2.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
20.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+20.0%
1919-1923 • 33-8-2
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-stint seasons for this program.
High Points
Best Season
Lafayette 1921
9-0 • SRS 28.0
Biggest Improvement
Lafayette 1921
9-0 • 18.2 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Pittsburgh 1930
6-2-1 • SRS 7.9
Biggest Drop
Pittsburgh 1935
7-1-2 • -11.2 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Pittsburgh | 1938 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | #8 | 20.2 | — | — | — | +1.6 | -15.0% |
| Pittsburgh | 1937 | 10 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 95.0% | — | #1 | 18.6 | — | — | — | -7.1 | +10.0% |
| Pittsburgh | 1936 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 85.0% | — | #3 | 25.7 | — | — | — | +14.0 | +5.0% |
| Pittsburgh | 1935 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 80.0% | — | — | 11.7 | — | — | — | -11.2 | -8.9% |
| Pittsburgh | 1934 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 22.9 | — | — | — | +4.8 | 0.0% |
| Pittsburgh | 1933 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 18.1 | — | — | — | +0.5 | +7.1% |
| Pittsburgh | 1932 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 81.8% | — | — | 17.6 | — | — | — | -5.8 | -7.1% |
| Pittsburgh | 1931 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 23.4 | — | — | — | +15.5 | +16.7% |
| Pittsburgh | 1930 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 72.2% | — | — | 7.9 | — | — | — | -9.6 | -17.8% |
| Pittsburgh | 1929 | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 90.0% | — | — | 17.5 | — | — | — | +7.9 | +17.8% |
| Pittsburgh | 1928 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 72.2% | — | — | 9.6 | — | — | — | -9.9 | -12.8% |
| Pittsburgh | 1927 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 85.0% | — | — | 19.5 | — | — | — | +3.7 | +18.3% |
| Pittsburgh | 1926 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 66.7% | — | — | 15.8 | — | — | — | -5.6 | -22.2% |
| Pittsburgh | 1925 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 21.4 | — | — | — | +10.4 | +27.8% |
| Pittsburgh | 1924 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 61.1% | — | — | 11.0 | — | — | — | -4.4 | -16.7% |
| Lafayette | 1923 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 77.8% | — | — | 15.4 | — | — | — | -3.1 | 0.0% |
| Lafayette | 1922 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% | — | — | 18.5 | — | — | — | -9.5 | -22.2% |
| Lafayette | 1921 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | — | 28.0 | — | — | — | +18.2 | +37.5% |
| Lafayette | 1920 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% | — | — | 9.8 | — | — | — | -5.9 | -12.5% |
| Lafayette | 1919 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% | — | — | 15.7 | — | — | — | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.6
Avg SRS 16.9 • Peak SRS 31.5 • 15 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 6.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.4
Avg SRS 16.0 • Peak SRS 28.3 • 22 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 6.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.8
Avg SRS 19.2 • Peak SRS 32.8 • 19 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 5.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.8
Avg SRS 15.0 • Peak SRS 23.7 • 18 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 4.5
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.8
Avg SRS 19.2 • Peak SRS 29.9 • 17 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 6.7
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS 18.5 • Peak SRS 33.9 • 17 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →