Back to Coaches
Longevity CoachBalancedElite Peak

Coach Profile

Ray Morrison

1916-1948SMU, Temple, Vanderbilt

3 schools coached, anchored by SMU.

Ray Morrison coached 29 seasons, won 57.9%, and posted an average SRS of 2.7. Best season: 1927 SMU. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 3 stops shaped the career arc.

Career record
142-99-33
Career win rate
57.9%
Average SRS
2.7
Peak SRS
25.4

Career Dossier

One glance at the full arc.

The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.

Seasons coached
29
Career span
33 years
Best finish
Consistency
3.1

Primary school anchor

SMU

Balanced profile with 3 program stops and a peak score of 93.0.

Career Arc

Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.

Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.

Ray Morrison
EliteStrongAverageLean
Ray Morrison: 1918 VanderbiltRay Morrison: 1922 SMURay Morrison: 1935 VanderbiltRay Morrison: 1940 Temple
1916Actual season year • SRS range -41.1 to 25.41948

Active comparison point

Ray Morrison1927

Selected

1927 SMU

Best season

7-2 • SRS 25.4 • SP Overall

Win %

77.8%

YoY SRS

+15.0

SP Off / Def

/

Finish

Unranked

Comparison context

Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.

Tenure map

Each stop expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.

Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure

Temple

1940-19489 seasons

Avg SRS -6.5 • Win % 45.5%

Vanderbilt

1918-19396 seasons

Avg SRS 7.0 • Win % 56.6%

SMU

1916-193414 seasons

Avg SRS 7.0 • Win % 65.0%

Longest tenure
SMU • 14 seasons
Best tenure
SMU • 7.0 SRS
Best tenure win rate
SMU • 65.0%

Style and Strength Profile

Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.

These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.

Overall Strength

Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.

Not enough data to compare.

Overall Strength

Decisive edge

Not enough data to compare.

Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.

Ray Morrison

Insufficient sample

Raw avg SP Overall
Percentile

Insufficient sample

Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.

Impact by school

See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.

Temple

1940-194831-38-9

Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).

Avg SRS -6.5Win % 45.5%

Avg wins

Higher is better

3.4 during vs 4.2 baseline

-0.8

Avg SRS

Higher is better

-6.5 during vs 3.4 baseline

-9.9

Avg SP Overall

Higher is better

during vs baseline

Ranked finish rate

Higher is better

0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline

+0.0%

Vanderbilt

1918-193929-22-2

Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).

Avg SRS 7.0Win % 56.6%

Avg wins

Higher is better

4.8 during vs 5.6 baseline

-0.8

Avg SRS

Higher is better

7.0 during vs 3.0 baseline

+4.0

Avg SP Overall

Higher is better

during vs baseline

Ranked finish rate

Higher is better

0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline

+0.0%

SMU

1916-193482-39-22

Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.

Avg SRS 7.0Win % 65.0%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.

Career highs and lows

High Points

Best Season

SMU 1927

7-2SRS 25.4

Biggest Improvement

SMU 1927

7-215.0 SRS

Best Offensive Season

Unavailable

Best Defensive Season

Unavailable

Setbacks

Worst Season

SMU 1916

0-8-2SRS -41.1

Biggest Drop

SMU 1928

6-3-1-19.2 SRS

Season-by-season results

Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.

Temple1948926127.8%-13.0-2.4-5.6%
Temple1947936033.3%-10.6-7.9-4.2%
Temple1946824237.5%-2.7-0.8-50.0%
Temple1945871087.5%-1.9+12.0+50.0%
Temple1944824237.5%-13.9+4.6+12.5%
Temple1943826025.0%-18.5-13.4-10.0%
Temple19421025335.0%-5.1-8.7-42.8%
Temple1941972077.8%3.60.0+27.8%
Temple1940944150.0%3.6+2.4+25.0%
Vanderbilt19391027125.0%1.2-4.6-41.7%
Vanderbilt1938963066.7%5.8-6.2-11.1%
Vanderbilt1937972077.8%12.0+6.9+38.9%
Vanderbilt1936935138.9%5.1-5.7-31.1%
Vanderbilt19351073070.0%10.8-3.9-5.0%
SMU19341282275.0%14.7+8.6+37.5%
SMU19331247137.5%6.1+6.1+4.2%
SMU19321237233.3%0.0-10.2-53.0%
SMU19311191186.4%10.2-3.7+21.4%
SMU19301063165.0%13.9-7.3-15.0%
SMU19291060480.0%21.2+15.0+15.0%
SMU19281063165.0%6.2-19.2-12.8%
SMU1927972077.8%25.4+15.0-16.7%
SMU1926980194.4%10.4+6.3+27.8%
SMU1925952266.7%4.1-2.0-3.3%
SMU19241051470.0%6.1-11.7-30.0%
SMU19239900100.0%17.8+14.8+35.0%
SMU19221063165.0%3.0-1.7%
Vanderbilt1918642066.7%+56.7%
SMU19161008210.0%-41.1

Similar coaches

Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.

Dick Tomey

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.2

Balanced

Avg SRS 1.5 • Peak SRS 17.429 seasons

Best finish #4 • Volatility 9.7

Open profile →

Bobby Ross

volatility within 0.3 • career span within 1 years

Defense-First

Avg SRS 0.7 • Peak SRS 21.918 seasons

Best finish #2 • Volatility 12.9

Open profile →

John Heisman

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2

Balanced

Avg SRS 2.8 • Peak SRS 29.126 seasons

Best finish Unranked • Volatility 10.0

Open profile →

Don Nehlen

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.8

Balanced

Avg SRS 4.4 • Peak SRS 22.930 seasons

Best finish #5 • Volatility 7.8

Open profile →

Lou Little

same balanced identity • volatility within 0.8

Balanced

Avg SRS -2.4 • Peak SRS 20.030 seasons

Best finish #20 • Volatility 12.4

Open profile →

Frank Howard

same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8

Balanced

Avg SRS 3.5 • Peak SRS 14.530 seasons

Best finish #10 • Volatility 8.2

Open profile →