Top 25
4-32
- Games
- 36
- Win rate
- 11.1%
Coach Profile
2001-2025 • Rutgers
One defining program at Rutgers.
Greg Schiano coached 17 seasons, won 48.2%, and posted an average SRS of -0.4. Best season: 2006 Rutgers. The profile was defense-first with a highly volatile profile. 2 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Rutgers
Defense-First profile with 1 program stop and a peak score of 74.9.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
11-2 • SRS 15.5 • SP Overall 14.8
Win %
84.6%
YoY SRS
+13.9
SP Off / Def
27.9 / 14.1
Finish
#12
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
4-32
Top 10
2-13
Top 5
2-10
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Rutgers
2020-2025 • 6 seasons
Avg SRS 0.2 • Win % 43.3%
Rutgers
2001-2011 • 11 seasons
Avg SRS -0.7 • Win % 50.4%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Greg Schiano sets the reference point in overall strength.
Greg Schiano sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Greg Schiano
Mixed
Mixed
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
2020-2025 • 26-34
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
4.3 during vs 2.4 baseline
+1.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
0.2 during vs -10.9 baseline
+11.1
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-1.9 during vs -11.5 baseline
+9.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
2001-2011 • 68-67
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.2 during vs 2.2 baseline
+4.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-0.7 during vs -16.2 baseline
+15.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-1.5 during vs -17.1 baseline
+15.6
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
9.1% during vs 0.0% baseline
+9.1%
High Points
Best Season
Rutgers 2006
11-2 • SRS 15.5
Biggest Improvement
Rutgers 2003
5-7 • 15.3 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Rutgers 2007
8-5 • SP Off 37.0
Best Defensive Season
Rutgers 2006
11-2 • SP Def 14.1
Setbacks
Worst Season
Rutgers 2001
2-9 • SRS -17.4
Biggest Drop
Rutgers 2010
4-8 • -15.2 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Rutgers | 2025 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | 2.4 | 1.0 | 31.6 | 30.7 | -2.7 | — |
| Rutgers | 2024 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 5.1 | 6.4 | 28.5 | 22.8 | +2.0 | 0.0% |
| Rutgers | 2023 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 3.1 | 3.5 | 21.0 | 18.7 | +10.4 | +20.5% |
| Rutgers | 2022 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -7.3 | -9.1 | 16.4 | 25.2 | -7.7 | -5.1% |
| Rutgers | 2021 | 13 | 5 | 8 | 0 | 38.5% | — | — | 0.4 | -3.0 | 20.8 | 23.7 | +3.1 | +5.1% |
| Rutgers | 2020 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -2.7 | -10.5 | 20.8 | 31.5 | -8.1 | -35.9% |
| Rutgers | 2011 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 5.4 | 0.8 | 20.5 | 19.3 | +15.1 | +35.9% |
| Rutgers | 2010 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -9.7 | -11.7 | 17.0 | 27.7 | -15.2 | -35.9% |
| Rutgers | 2009 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 5.5 | 3.1 | 22.1 | 19.0 | -1.4 | +7.7% |
| Rutgers | 2008 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | — | — | 6.9 | 2.4 | 28.8 | 25.2 | -1.5 | 0.0% |
| Rutgers | 2007 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #16 | — | 8.4 | 14.3 | 37.0 | 22.2 | -7.1 | -23.1% |
| Rutgers | 2006 | 13 | 11 | 2 | 0 | 84.6% | — | #12 | 15.5 | 14.8 | 27.9 | 14.1 | +13.9 | +26.3% |
| Rutgers | 2005 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 1.6 | 4.0 | 29.5 | 25.5 | +8.4 | +22.0% |
| Rutgers | 2004 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | -6.8 | -6.7 | 30.9 | 36.3 | -5.8 | -5.3% |
| Rutgers | 2003 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -1.0 | 0.0 | 34.7 | 34.8 | +15.3 | +33.3% |
| Rutgers | 2002 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 8.3% | — | — | -16.3 | -16.9 | 20.0 | 35.3 | +1.1 | -9.8% |
| Rutgers | 2001 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 18.2% | — | — | -17.4 | -20.8 | 18.7 | 37.1 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.7
Avg SRS -2.1 • Peak SRS 6.8 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.0
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.2
Avg SRS 2.2 • Peak SRS 17.7 • 27 seasons
Best finish #15 • Volatility 8.7
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 0.7
Avg SRS 1.8 • Peak SRS 17.0 • 22 seasons
Best finish #6 • Volatility 7.8
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.5
Avg SRS -1.9 • Peak SRS 15.8 • 17 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 9.6
Open profile →same defense-first identity • volatility within 1.0
Avg SRS 3.1 • Peak SRS 18.5 • 26 seasons
Best finish #12 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →avg SRS within 0.4 • volatility within 0.9
Avg SRS -0.8 • Peak SRS 20.5 • 25 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →