Top 25
6-33
- Games
- 39
- Win rate
- 15.4%
Coach Profile
1995-2016 • Baylor, Ohio, Wake Forest
3 schools coached, anchored by Wake Forest.
Jim Grobe coached 20 seasons, won 49.2%, and posted an average SRS of -1.2. Best season: 2006 Wake Forest. The profile was balanced with a swing-heavy profile. 3 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Wake Forest
Balanced profile with 3 program stops and a peak score of 56.5.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
11-3 • SRS 8.0 • SP Overall 6.5
Win %
78.6%
YoY SRS
+8.9
SP Off / Def
23.6 / 18.4
Finish
#18
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
6-33
Top 10
0-13
Top 5
0-7
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Baylor
2016-2016 • 1 seasons
Avg SRS 3.9 • Win % 53.8%
Wake Forest
2001-2013 • 13 seasons
Avg SRS 0.9 • Win % 48.4%
Ohio
1995-2000 • 6 seasons
Avg SRS -6.6 • Win % 50.0%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Jim Grobe sets the reference point in overall strength.
Jim Grobe sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Jim Grobe
Mixed
Mixed
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
2016-2016 • 7-6
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.0 during vs 10.0 baseline
-3.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
3.9 during vs 17.7 baseline
-13.8
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
11.3 during vs 17.1 baseline
-5.8
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 80.0% baseline
-80.0%
2001-2013 • 77-82
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.9 during vs 4.0 baseline
+1.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
0.9 during vs -5.6 baseline
+6.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
0.3 during vs -7.9 baseline
+8.2
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
7.7% during vs 0.0% baseline
+7.7%
1995-2000 • 33-33-1
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.5 during vs 1.6 baseline
+3.9
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-6.6 during vs -25.1 baseline
+18.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-3.9 during vs -20.4 baseline
+16.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
Wake Forest 2006
11-3 • SRS 8.0
Biggest Improvement
Ohio 1996
6-6 • 16.1 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Wake Forest 2003
5-7 • SP Off 37.8
Best Defensive Season
Wake Forest 2008
8-5 • SP Def 13.6
Setbacks
Worst Season
Ohio 1995
2-8-1 • SRS -20.5
Biggest Drop
Ohio 1998
5-6 • -11.8 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Baylor | 2016 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | #23 | — | 3.9 | 11.3 | 37.0 | 24.2 | +5.7 | +20.5% |
| Wake Forest | 2013 | 12 | 4 | 8 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | -1.8 | -2.8 | 19.4 | 21.3 | +10.0 | -8.3% |
| Wake Forest | 2012 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -11.8 | -11.9 | 20.1 | 30.1 | -8.9 | -4.5% |
| Wake Forest | 2011 | 13 | 6 | 7 | 0 | 46.2% | — | — | -2.9 | -3.5 | 26.4 | 28.9 | +5.7 | +21.1% |
| Wake Forest | 2010 | 12 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 25.0% | — | — | -8.6 | -12.1 | 20.7 | 32.4 | -11.7 | -16.7% |
| Wake Forest | 2009 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | 3.1 | 3.3 | 32.6 | 28.3 | -4.5 | -19.9% |
| Wake Forest | 2008 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #23 | — | 7.6 | 6.4 | 20.3 | 13.6 | +1.0 | -7.7% |
| Wake Forest | 2007 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | — | 6.6 | 6.4 | 23.9 | 19.0 | -1.4 | -9.3% |
| Wake Forest | 2006 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% | — | #18 | 8.0 | 6.5 | 23.6 | 18.4 | +8.9 | +42.2% |
| Wake Forest | 2005 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | -0.9 | -3.9 | 23.3 | 27.1 | -1.6 | 0.0% |
| Wake Forest | 2004 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | 0.7 | -0.9 | 26.2 | 27.3 | -4.6 | -5.3% |
| Wake Forest | 2003 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | 5.3 | 7.5 | 37.8 | 32.4 | -0.2 | -12.2% |
| Wake Forest | 2002 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 0 | 53.8% | — | — | 5.5 | 7.5 | 35.2 | 29.5 | +4.1 | -0.7% |
| Wake Forest | 2001 | 11 | 6 | 5 | 0 | 54.5% | — | — | 1.4 | 1.5 | 35.6 | 34.6 | +1.9 | -9.1% |
| Ohio | 2000 | 11 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 63.6% | — | — | -0.5 | -0.7 | 29.3 | 30.2 | +6.4 | +18.2% |
| Ohio | 1999 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -6.9 | -6.7 | 27.8 | 33.7 | +2.7 | 0.0% |
| Ohio | 1998 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | -9.6 | -3.7 | 30.1 | 33.6 | -11.8 | -27.3% |
| Ohio | 1997 | 11 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 72.7% | — | — | 2.2 | 7.5 | 29.0 | 22.8 | +6.6 | +22.7% |
| Ohio | 1996 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -4.4 | 1.2 | 27.8 | 27.3 | +16.1 | +27.3% |
| Ohio | 1995 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 1 | 22.7% | — | — | -20.5 | -21.1 | 18.0 | 36.9 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS -0.8 • Peak SRS 20.5 • 25 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS -1.4 • Peak SRS 18.4 • 23 seasons
Best finish #20 • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.1
Avg SRS -2.2 • Peak SRS 7.8 • 10 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 7.2
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS -0.8 • Peak SRS 10.2 • 19 seasons
Best finish #22 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS -0.2 • Peak SRS 14.3 • 22 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 7.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -0.8 • Peak SRS 9.3 • 17 seasons
Best finish #0 • Volatility 7.1
Open profile →