Fordham
1928-1932 • 31-9-4
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Coach Profile
1903-1932 • Boston College, Dartmouth, Fordham, Holy Cross
4 schools coached, anchored by Dartmouth.
Frank Cavanaugh coached 14 seasons, won 73.0%, and posted an average SRS of 12.4. Best season: 1914 Dartmouth. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 4 stops shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Dartmouth
Balanced profile with 4 program stops and a peak score of 95.7.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
8-1 • SRS 28.3 • SP Overall —
Win %
88.9%
YoY SRS
+6.2
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Each stop expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Fordham
1928-1932 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS 10.9 • Win % 75.0%
Boston College
1919-1919 • 1 seasons
Avg SRS 7.8 • Win % 62.5%
Dartmouth
1912-1916 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS 20.6 • Win % 80.7%
Holy Cross
1903-1905 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS 2.9 • Win % 60.7%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Frank Cavanaugh
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
1928-1932 • 31-9-4
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
1919-1919 • 5-3
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
1912-1916 • 34-7-3
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
1903-1905 • 16-10-2
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
High Points
Best Season
Dartmouth 1914
8-1 • SRS 28.3
Biggest Improvement
Dartmouth 1912
7-2 • 30.2 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Holy Cross 1905
6-3 • SRS -8.4
Biggest Drop
Holy Cross 1905
6-3 • -15.5 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Fordham | 1932 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 75.0% | — | — | 11.4 | — | — | — | -3.8 | -2.8% |
| Fordham | 1931 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 77.8% | — | — | 15.2 | — | — | — | +5.5 | -11.1% |
| Fordham | 1930 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 9.7 | — | — | — | -6.5 | 0.0% |
| Fordham | 1929 | 9 | 7 | 0 | 2 | 88.9% | — | — | 16.2 | — | — | — | +14.3 | +44.4% |
| Fordham | 1928 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% | — | — | 1.9 | — | — | — | -5.9 | -18.1% |
| Boston College | 1919 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 62.5% | — | — | 7.8 | — | — | — | -9.7 | -4.2% |
| Dartmouth | 1916 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 66.7% | — | — | 17.5 | — | — | — | +4.2 | -16.7% |
| Dartmouth | 1915 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% | — | — | 13.3 | — | — | — | -15.0 | -5.6% |
| Dartmouth | 1914 | 9 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 88.9% | — | — | 28.3 | — | — | — | +6.2 | +1.4% |
| Dartmouth | 1913 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 87.5% | — | — | 22.1 | — | — | — | +0.3 | +9.7% |
| Dartmouth | 1912 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 77.8% | — | — | 21.8 | — | — | — | +30.2 | +11.1% |
| Holy Cross | 1905 | 9 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | -8.4 | — | — | — | -15.5 | +33.3% |
| Holy Cross | 1904 | 9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 33.3% | — | — | 7.1 | — | — | — | -2.9 | -46.7% |
| Holy Cross | 1903 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 10.0 | — | — | — | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS 11.4 • Peak SRS 36.4 • 29 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.4
Avg SRS 11.0 • Peak SRS 24.5 • 29 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 7.4
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.3
Avg SRS 11.1 • Peak SRS 26.9 • 28 seasons
Best finish #3 • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.8
Avg SRS 10.7 • Peak SRS 31.4 • 24 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.4
Avg SRS 12.0 • Peak SRS 25.0 • 24 seasons
Best finish #2 • Volatility 6.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • volatility within 0.0
Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 24.2 • 29 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →