William & Mary
1964-1968 • 23-25-2
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Avg SRS -9.4Win % 48.0%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.
Back to Coaches
Longevity CoachBalanced
Coach Profile
Marv Levy
1958-1968 • California, New Mexico, William & Mary
3 schools coached, anchored by William & Mary.
Marv Levy coached 11 seasons, won 43.2%, and posted an average SRS of -4.8. Best season: 1963 California. The profile was balanced with a mostly steady profile. 3 stops shaped the career arc.
- Career record
- 45-60-5
- Career win rate
- 43.2%
- Average SRS
- -4.8
- Peak SRS
- 5.7
Career Dossier
One glance at the full arc.
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
- Seasons coached
- 11
- Career span
- 11 years
- Best finish
- —
- Consistency
- 61.2
Primary school anchor
William & Mary
Balanced profile with 3 program stops and a peak score of 49.7.
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Marv Levy
EliteStrongAverageLean
Marv Levy: 1960 CaliforniaMarv Levy: 1964 William & Mary
1958Actual season year • SRS range -14.2 to 5.71968
Active comparison point
Marv Levy • 1963
1963 California
Best season4-5-1 • SRS 5.7 • SP Overall —
Win %
45.0%
YoY SRS
+6.1
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Tenure map
Each stop expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure
William & Mary
1964-1968 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS -9.4 • Win % 48.0%
California
1960-1963 • 4 seasons
Avg SRS -1.0 • Win % 23.8%
New Mexico
1958-1959 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS -0.7 • Win % 70.0%
- Longest tenure
- William & Mary • 5 seasons
- Best tenure
- New Mexico • -0.7 SRS
- Best tenure win rate
- New Mexico • 70.0%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Marv Levy
Insufficient sample
- Raw avg SP Overall
- —
- Percentile
- —
Insufficient sample
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Impact by school
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
California
1960-1963 • 8-29-3
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS -1.0Win % 23.8%
Avg wins
Higher is better
2.0 during vs 3.0 baseline
-1.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-1.0 during vs 2.5 baseline
-3.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 20.0% baseline
-20.0%
New Mexico
1958-1959 • 14-6
Compared with this school's baseline outside the tenure over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg SRS -0.7Win % 70.0%
Avg wins
Higher is better
7.0 during vs 4.0 baseline
+3.0
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-0.7 during vs -17.2 baseline
+16.6
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
Career highs and lows
High Points
Best Season
California 1963
4-5-1 • SRS 5.7
Biggest Improvement
New Mexico 1959
7-3 • 9.5 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
William & Mary 1968
3-7 • SRS -14.2
Biggest Drop
William & Mary 1964
4-6 • -19.2 SRS
Season-by-season results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| William & Mary | 1968 | 10 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 30.0% | — | — | -14.2 | — | — | — | -10.6 | -25.0% |
| William & Mary | 1967 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 55.0% | — | — | -3.6 | — | — | — | +5.6 | 0.0% |
| William & Mary | 1966 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 55.0% | — | — | -9.2 | — | — | — | -2.8 | -5.0% |
| William & Mary | 1965 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% | — | — | -6.4 | — | — | — | +7.1 | +20.0% |
| William & Mary | 1964 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% | — | — | -13.5 | — | — | — | -19.2 | -5.0% |
| California | 1963 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 45.0% | — | — | 5.7 | — | — | — | +6.1 | +35.0% |
| California | 1962 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 10.0% | — | — | -0.4 | — | — | — | +4.4 | -5.0% |
| California | 1961 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 15.0% | — | — | -4.8 | — | — | — | -0.3 | -10.0% |
| California | 1960 | 10 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 25.0% | — | — | -4.5 | — | — | — | -8.6 | -45.0% |
| New Mexico | 1959 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | 4.1 | — | — | — | +9.5 | 0.0% |
| New Mexico | 1958 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | -5.4 | — | — | — | — | — |
Similar coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
Jimmy DeHart
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -5.0 • Peak SRS 6.3 • 11 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.8
Open profile →Sarkis Arslanian
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS -4.7 • Peak SRS 5.4 • 9 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.3
Open profile →John Bender
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS -5.2 • Peak SRS 6.5 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.2
Open profile →Mark Banks
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.7
Avg SRS -4.1 • Peak SRS 3.5 • 8 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.1
Open profile →Albert Exendine
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.4
Avg SRS -3.4 • Peak SRS 2.9 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.0
Open profile →Harry Hartsell
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS -4.4 • Peak SRS 4.9 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.3
Open profile →