Top 25
7-31
- Games
- 38
- Win rate
- 18.4%
Coach Profile
1989-2006 • Pacific, Pittsburgh, Stanford
3 schools coached, anchored by Pittsburgh.
Walt Harris coached 13 seasons, won 44.8%, and posted an average SRS of -2.1. Best season: 2002 Pittsburgh. The profile was offense-first with a highly volatile profile. 3 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Pittsburgh
Offense-First profile with 3 program stops and a peak score of 63.0.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
9-4 • SRS 10.5 • SP Overall 14.5
Win %
69.2%
YoY SRS
+3.1
SP Off / Def
32.7 / 19.2
Finish
#19
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
7-31
Top 10
2-17
Top 5
2-10
| 2006 Regular Week 14 | Stanford | California | #21 | L17-26 |
| 2006 Regular Week 10 | Stanford | USC | #9 | L0-42 |
| 2006 Regular Week 6 | Stanford | Notre Dame | #12 | L10-31 |
| 2006 Regular Week 1 | Stanford | Oregon | #21 | L10-48 |
| 2005 Regular Week 13 | Stanford | Notre Dame | #6 | L31-38 |
| 2005 Regular Week 10 | Stanford | USC | #1 | L21-51 |
| 2005 Regular Week 9 | Stanford | UCLA | #8 | L27-30 |
| 2004 Regular Week 14 | Pittsburgh | West Virginia | #21 | W16-13 |
| 2004 Regular Week 12 | Pittsburgh | Notre Dame | #24 | W41-38 |
| 2004 Postseason Week 1 | Pittsburgh | Utah | #4 | L7-35 |
| 2003 Regular Week 15 | Pittsburgh | Miami | #10 | L14-28 |
| 2003 Regular Week 12 | Pittsburgh | Virginia Tech | #5 | W31-28 |
| 2002 Regular Week 15 | Pittsburgh | West Virginia | #24 | L17-24 |
| 2002 Regular Week 14 | Pittsburgh | Miami | #1 | L21-28 |
| 2002 Regular Week 11 | Pittsburgh | Virginia Tech | #3 | W28-21 |
| 2002 Regular Week 8 | Pittsburgh | Notre Dame | #8 | L6-14 |
| 2002 Regular Week 3 | Pittsburgh | Texas A&M | #20 | L12-14 |
| 2001 Regular Week 11 | Pittsburgh | Virginia Tech | #12 | W38-7 |
| 2001 Regular Week 6 | Pittsburgh | Miami | #1 | L21-43 |
| 2000 Regular Week 12 | Pittsburgh | Miami | #2 | L7-35 |
| 2000 Regular Week 10 | Pittsburgh | Virginia Tech | #2 | L34-37 |
| 2000 Postseason Week 1 | Pittsburgh | Iowa State | #25 | L29-37 |
| 1999 Regular Week 11 | Pittsburgh | Miami | #22 | L3-33 |
| 1999 Regular Week 10 | Pittsburgh | Virginia Tech | #3 | L17-30 |
| 1999 Regular Week 7 | Pittsburgh | Syracuse | #18 | L17-24 |
| 1999 Regular Week 3 | Pittsburgh | Penn State | #2 | L17-20 |
| 1998 Regular Week 13 | Pittsburgh | Miami | #19 | L10-38 |
| 1998 Regular Week 10 | Pittsburgh | Syracuse | #15 | L28-45 |
| 1998 Regular Week 5 | Pittsburgh | Virginia Tech | #19 | L7-27 |
| 1998 Regular Week 4 | Pittsburgh | Penn State | #7 | L13-20 |
| 1997 Regular Week 14 | Pittsburgh | Virginia Tech | #19 | W30-23 |
| 1997 Regular Week 13 | Pittsburgh | Syracuse | #21 | L27-32 |
| 1997 Regular Week 5 | Pittsburgh | Miami | #22 | W21-17 |
| 1997 Regular Week 3 | Pittsburgh | Penn State | #1 | L17-34 |
| 1997 Postseason Week 1 | Pittsburgh | Southern Miss | #19 | L7-41 |
| 1990 Regular Week 2 | Pacific | Tennessee | #8 | L7-55 |
| 1989 Regular Week 9 | Pacific | Arizona | #17 | L14-38 |
| 1989 Regular Week 2 | Pacific | Auburn | #5 | L0-55 |
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Stanford
2005-2006 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS -3.0 • Win % 26.1%
Pittsburgh
1997-2004 • 8 seasons
Avg SRS 2.9 • Win % 54.2%
Pacific
1989-1991 • 3 seasons
Avg SRS -14.9 • Win % 31.4%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Walt Harris sets the reference point in overall strength.
Walt Harris sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Walt Harris
Mixed
Mixed
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
2005-2006 • 6-17
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
3.0 during vs 4.8 baseline
-1.8
Avg SRS
Higher is better
-3.0 during vs 3.4 baseline
-6.3
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
-6.8 during vs 5.4 baseline
-12.2
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 20.0% baseline
-20.0%
1997-2004 • 52-44
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.5 during vs 2.7 baseline
+3.8
Avg SRS
Higher is better
2.9 during vs -8.0 baseline
+10.9
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
5.2 during vs -8.2 baseline
+13.4
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
25.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+25.0%
1989-1991 • 11-24
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-stint seasons for this program.
High Points
Best Season
Pittsburgh 2002
9-4 • SRS 10.5
Biggest Improvement
Pittsburgh 1999
5-6 • 7.1 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Pacific 1991
5-7 • SP Off 40.8
Best Defensive Season
Pittsburgh 2002
9-4 • SP Def 19.2
Setbacks
Worst Season
Pacific 1989
2-10 • SRS -20.3
Biggest Drop
Stanford 2006
1-11 • -15.5 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Stanford | 2006 | 12 | 1 | 11 | 0 | 8.3% | — | — | -10.7 | -14.1 | 14.8 | 27.6 | -15.5 | -37.1% |
| Stanford | 2005 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | 4.8 | 0.6 | 26.4 | 25.7 | +1.4 | -21.2% |
| Pittsburgh | 2004 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | #25 | 3.4 | 6.4 | 32.1 | 27.4 | -4.1 | +5.1% |
| Pittsburgh | 2003 | 13 | 8 | 5 | 0 | 61.5% | #10 | — | 7.5 | 11.0 | 37.6 | 28.5 | -3.0 | -7.7% |
| Pittsburgh | 2002 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #19 | 10.5 | 14.5 | 32.7 | 19.2 | +3.1 | +10.9% |
| Pittsburgh | 2001 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 7.4 | 12.0 | 33.5 | 22.8 | +1.9 | 0.0% |
| Pittsburgh | 2000 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 5.5 | 9.6 | 31.5 | 23.3 | +4.3 | +12.9% |
| Pittsburgh | 1999 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | 1.2 | 2.8 | 32.1 | 30.4 | +7.1 | +27.3% |
| Pittsburgh | 1998 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 18.2% | — | — | -5.9 | -8.0 | 25.7 | 33.1 | +0.5 | -31.8% |
| Pittsburgh | 1997 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | -6.4 | -6.7 | 32.3 | 37.2 | +4.0 | +8.3% |
| Pacific | 1991 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 0 | 41.7% | — | — | -10.4 | -9.7 | 40.8 | 45.6 | +3.7 | +5.3% |
| Pacific | 1990 | 11 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 36.4% | — | — | -14.1 | -13.3 | 36.2 | 43.5 | +6.2 | +19.7% |
| Pacific | 1989 | 12 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 16.7% | — | — | -20.3 | -20.2 | 20.0 | 38.0 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS -2.2 • Peak SRS 6.1 • 9 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.5
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.6
Avg SRS -2.8 • Peak SRS 9.8 • 16 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 9.1
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.4
Avg SRS -0.7 • Peak SRS 17.7 • 16 seasons
Best finish #22 • Volatility 9.8
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 1.0
Avg SRS -3.1 • Peak SRS 12.1 • 15 seasons
Best finish #23 • Volatility 7.6
Open profile →same offense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS -2.0 • Peak SRS 13.0 • 12 seasons
Best finish #11 • Volatility 7.5
Open profile →same offense-first identity • volatility within 0.9
Avg SRS 0.2 • Peak SRS 11.7 • 14 seasons
Best finish #16 • Volatility 8.4
Open profile →