Lehigh
1895-1895 • 3-6
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Avg SRS —Win % 33.3%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.
Back to Coaches
Coach ProfileBalanced
Coach Profile
Laurie Bliss
1893-1895 • Army, Lehigh
2 schools coached, anchored by Lehigh.
Laurie Bliss coached 2 seasons, won 38.9%, and posted an average SRS of —. Peak timing is limited by missing SRS data. The profile was balanced with limited volatility context. 2 stops shaped the career arc.
- Career record
- 7-11
- Career win rate
- 38.9%
- Average SRS
- —
- Peak SRS
- —
Career Dossier
One glance at the full arc.
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
- Seasons coached
- 2
- Career span
- 3 years
- Best finish
- —
- Consistency
- —
Primary school anchor
Lehigh
Balanced profile with 2 program stops and a peak score of —.
Career Arc
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stop began.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Laurie Bliss
EliteStrongAverageLean
Laurie Bliss: 1895 Lehigh
1893Actual season year • SRS range 0.0 to 1.01895
Tenure map
Each stop expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Length = seasons coachedDeeper color = stronger tenure
Lehigh
1895-1895 • 1 seasons
Avg SRS — • Win % 33.3%
Army
1893-1893 • 1 seasons
Avg SRS — • Win % 44.4%
- Longest tenure
- Lehigh • 1 seasons
- Best tenure
- Lehigh • — SRS
- Best tenure win rate
- Army • 44.4%
Style and Strength Profile
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Overall Strength
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Overall Strength
Decisive edgeNot enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Laurie Bliss
Insufficient sample
- Raw avg SP Overall
- —
- Percentile
- —
Insufficient sample
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
Impact by school
See how each stop compared with what that program usually looked like outside this tenure.
Army
1893-1893 • 4-5
Baseline comparison is omitted when there are not enough outside-tenure seasons for this program.
Avg SRS —Win % 44.4%
No school baseline data available for this tenure.
Career highs and lows
High Points
Best Season
Unavailable
Biggest Improvement
Unavailable
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Worst Season
Unavailable
Biggest Drop
Unavailable
Season-by-season results
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Lehigh | 1895 | 9 | 3 | 6 | 0 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | -11.1% |
| Army | 1893 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Similar coaches
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
Harmon Graves
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS — • Peak SRS — • 3 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility —
Open profile →John Eckstrom
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS — • Peak SRS — • 3 seasons
Best finish #0 • Volatility —
Open profile →AE Herrnstein
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS — • Peak SRS — • 4 seasons
Best finish #0 • Volatility —
Open profile →Alexander Lilley
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS — • Peak SRS — • 2 seasons
Best finish #0 • Volatility —
Open profile →Alvin Culver
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS — • Peak SRS — • 2 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility —
Open profile →David Edwards
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS — • Peak SRS — • 2 seasons
Best finish #0 • Volatility —
Open profile →