Top 25
2-6
- Games
- 8
- Win rate
- 25.0%
Coach Profile
2022-2023 • Mississippi State
One defining program at Mississippi State.
Zach Arnett coached 2 seasons, won 45.5%, and posted an average SRS of 5.7. Best season: 2022 Mississippi State. The profile was defense-first with limited volatility context. One primary stint defined the run.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Mississippi State
Defense-First profile with 1 program stop and a peak score of 68.8.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
1-0 • SRS 13.1 • SP Overall 15.4
Win %
100.0%
YoY SRS
—
SP Off / Def
35.1 / 19.9
Finish
#20
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
2-6
Top 10
0-2
Top 5
0-1
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Mississippi State
2022-2023 • 2 seasons
Avg SRS 5.7 • Win % 45.5%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Zach Arnett sets the reference point in overall strength.
Zach Arnett sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Zach Arnett
Strong
Strong
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
2022-2023 • 5-6
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
2.5 during vs 5.9 baseline
-3.4
Avg SRS
Higher is better
5.7 during vs 9.9 baseline
-4.2
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
8.0 during vs 10.4 baseline
-2.4
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
50.0% during vs 20.0% baseline
+30.0%
High Points
Best Season
Mississippi State 2022
1-0 • SRS 13.1
Biggest Improvement
Mississippi State 2023
4-6 • -14.8 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Mississippi State 2022
1-0 • SP Off 35.1
Best Defensive Season
Mississippi State 2022
1-0 • SP Def 19.9
Setbacks
Worst Season
Mississippi State 2023
4-6 • SRS -1.7
Biggest Drop
Mississippi State 2023
4-6 • -14.8 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Mississippi State | 2023 | 10 | 4 | 6 | 0 | 40.0% | — | — | -1.7 | 0.5 | 24.7 | 24.9 | -14.8 | -60.0% |
| Mississippi State | 2022 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 100.0% | — | #20 | 13.1 | 15.4 | 35.1 | 19.9 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 4.9 • Peak SRS 13.4 • 3 seasons
Best finish #7 • Volatility 7.3
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.6
Avg SRS 6.3 • Peak SRS 12.8 • 2 seasons
Best finish #20 • Volatility 6.5
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS 5.4 • Peak SRS 15.9 • 4 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.5
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.1
Avg SRS 5.8 • Peak SRS 19.5 • 5 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.3
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS 5.7 • Peak SRS 15.8 • 5 seasons
Best finish #19 • Volatility 5.4
Open profile →same defense-first identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS 5.4 • Peak SRS 14.0 • 5 seasons
Best finish #13 • Volatility 5.5
Open profile →