Top 25
15-27
- Games
- 42
- Win rate
- 35.7%
Coach Profile
1989-2002 • Texas A&M
One defining program at Texas A&M.
RC Slocum coached 14 seasons, won 72.1%, and posted an average SRS of 13.1. Best season: 1993 Texas A&M. The profile was balanced with a very steady week-to-week shape. One primary stint defined the run.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
Texas A&M
Balanced profile with 1 program stop and a peak score of 87.3.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
10-2 • SRS 21.4 • SP Overall 24.0
Win %
83.3%
YoY SRS
+9.5
SP Off / Def
39.7 / 17.1
Finish
#9
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
15-27
Top 10
7-17
Top 5
1-10
| 2002 Regular Week 15 | Texas A&M | Texas | #10 | L20-50 |
| 2002 Regular Week 12 | Texas A&M | Oklahoma | #1 | W30-26 |
| 2002 Regular Week 5 | Texas A&M | Virginia Tech | #7 | L3-13 |
| 2001 Regular Week 14 | Texas A&M | Texas | #5 | L7-21 |
| 2001 Regular Week 12 | Texas A&M | Oklahoma | #3 | L10-31 |
| 2001 Regular Week 8 | Texas A&M | Colorado | #20 | L21-31 |
| 2000 Regular Week 14 | Texas A&M | Texas | #12 | L17-43 |
| 2000 Regular Week 12 | Texas A&M | Oklahoma | #1 | L31-35 |
| 2000 Regular Week 10 | Texas A&M | Kansas State | #10 | W26-10 |
| 2000 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Mississippi State | #24 | L41-43 |
| 1999 Regular Week 14 | Texas A&M | Texas | #7 | W20-16 |
| 1999 Regular Week 11 | Texas A&M | Nebraska | #9 | L0-37 |
| 1999 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Penn State | #11 | L0-24 |
| 1998 Regular Week 14 | Texas A&M | Texas | #20 | L24-26 |
| 1998 Regular Week 12 | Texas A&M | Missouri | #19 | W17-14 |
| 1998 Regular Week 7 | Texas A&M | Nebraska | #8 | W28-21 |
| 1998 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Ohio State | #2 | L14-24 |
| 1998 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Kansas State | #10 | W36-33 |
| 1997 Regular Week 11 | Texas A&M | Oklahoma State | #19 | W28-25 |
| 1997 Regular Week 9 | Texas A&M | Kansas State | #20 | L17-36 |
| 1997 Regular Week 7 | Texas A&M | Colorado | #16 | W16-10 |
| 1997 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Nebraska | #2 | L15-54 |
| 1997 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | UCLA | #5 | L23-29 |
| 1996 Regular Week 9 | Texas A&M | Kansas State | #21 | L20-23 |
| 1996 Regular Week 6 | Texas A&M | Colorado | #12 | L10-24 |
| 1995 Regular Week 15 | Texas A&M | Texas | #9 | L6-16 |
| 1995 Regular Week 5 | Texas A&M | Colorado | #7 | L21-29 |
| 1995 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Michigan | #17 | W22-20 |
| 1994 Regular Week 3 | Texas A&M | Oklahoma | #15 | W36-14 |
| 1993 Regular Week 12 | Texas A&M | Louisville | #20 | W42-7 |
| 1993 Regular Week 3 | Texas A&M | Oklahoma | #17 | L14-44 |
| 1993 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Notre Dame | #2 | L21-24 |
| 1992 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Notre Dame | #4 | L3-28 |
| 1991 Regular Week 8 | Texas A&M | Baylor | #16 | W34-12 |
| 1991 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Florida State | #4 | L2-10 |
| 1990 Regular Week 15 | Texas A&M | Texas | #3 | L27-28 |
| 1990 Regular Week 8 | Texas A&M | Houston | #9 | L31-36 |
| 1990 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | BYU | #22 | W65-14 |
| 1989 Regular Week 13 | Texas A&M | Arkansas | #9 | L22-23 |
| 1989 Regular Week 7 | Texas A&M | Houston | #8 | W17-13 |
| 1989 Regular Week 1 | Texas A&M | LSU | #7 | W28-16 |
| 1989 Postseason Week 1 | Texas A&M | Pittsburgh | #17 | L28-31 |
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
Texas A&M
1989-2002 • 14 seasons
Avg SRS 13.1 • Win % 72.1%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
RC Slocum sets the reference point in overall strength.
RC Slocum sets the reference point in overall strength.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
RC Slocum
Elite
Elite
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
1989-2002 • 123-47-2
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
8.8 during vs 8.4 baseline
+0.4
Avg SRS
Higher is better
13.1 during vs 10.6 baseline
+2.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
16.8 during vs 13.3 baseline
+3.5
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
71.4% during vs 60.0% baseline
+11.4%
High Points
Best Season
Texas A&M 1993
10-2 • SRS 21.4
Biggest Improvement
Texas A&M 1993
10-2 • 9.5 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Texas A&M 1990
9-3-1 • SP Off 40.8
Best Defensive Season
Texas A&M 1998
11-3 • SP Def 11.3
Setbacks
Worst Season
Texas A&M 2001
8-4 • SRS 6.5
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 1999
8-4 • -10.2 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| Texas A&M | 2002 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | #23 | — | 6.7 | 7.8 | 35.0 | 29.0 | +0.2 | -16.7% |
| Texas A&M | 2001 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | — | 6.5 | 10.8 | 26.6 | 16.9 | -6.3 | +8.3% |
| Texas A&M | 2000 | 12 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 58.3% | — | — | 12.8 | 18.3 | 38.0 | 21.3 | +4.4 | -8.3% |
| Texas A&M | 1999 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | #7 | #23 | 8.4 | 13.2 | 33.8 | 21.6 | -10.2 | -11.9% |
| Texas A&M | 1998 | 14 | 11 | 3 | 0 | 78.6% | #14 | #11 | 18.6 | 24.0 | 34.9 | 11.3 | +9.3 | +9.3% |
| Texas A&M | 1997 | 13 | 9 | 4 | 0 | 69.2% | — | #20 | 9.3 | 11.8 | 36.2 | 26.6 | +1.2 | +19.2% |
| Texas A&M | 1996 | 12 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 50.0% | #13 | — | 8.1 | 10.5 | 35.4 | 26.9 | -4.6 | -25.0% |
| Texas A&M | 1995 | 12 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 75.0% | #3 | #15 | 12.7 | 17.4 | 30.9 | 14.7 | -0.9 | -20.4% |
| Texas A&M | 1994 | 11 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 95.5% | #15 | #8 | 13.6 | 17.9 | 33.6 | 17.4 | -7.8 | +12.1% |
| Texas A&M | 1993 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | #4 | #9 | 21.4 | 24.0 | 39.7 | 17.1 | +9.5 | -9.0% |
| Texas A&M | 1992 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | #7 | #7 | 11.9 | 16.2 | 32.6 | 18.0 | -8.1 | +9.0% |
| Texas A&M | 1991 | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 83.3% | #21 | #12 | 20.0 | 24.7 | 39.6 | 16.0 | +4.0 | +10.3% |
| Texas A&M | 1990 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 73.1% | #13 | #15 | 16.0 | 19.5 | 40.8 | 24.5 | -0.9 | +6.4% |
| Texas A&M | 1989 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 66.7% | — | #20 | 16.9 | 19.3 | 35.7 | 18.0 | — | — |
Related profiles are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.0
Avg SRS 13.0 • Peak SRS 18.0 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 4.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.8
Avg SRS 12.3 • Peak SRS 21.0 • 6 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.6
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS 12.1 • Peak SRS 24.1 • 9 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 6.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.5
Avg SRS 13.5 • Peak SRS 19.7 • 9 seasons
Best finish #9 • Volatility 5.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.8
Avg SRS 14.8 • Peak SRS 31.3 • 14 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 5.9
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.9
Avg SRS 11.2 • Peak SRS 19.4 • 13 seasons
Best finish #14 • Volatility 5.3
Open profile →