Top 25
5-11-2
- Games
- 18
- Win rate
- 33.3%
Coach Profile
1923-1949 • SMU, TCU, Texas A&M
3 schools coached, anchored by SMU.
Madison Bell's coaching record is 136-78-16, highlighted by seasons at SMU from 1923 to 1949.
Madison Bell coached 23 seasons, won 62.6%, and posted an average SRS of 8.5. Best season: 1935 SMU. The profile was balanced with a highly volatile profile. 4 stints shaped the career arc.
Career Dossier
The profile below keeps the headline numbers visible, then moves into tenure shape, school impact, and full season detail.
Primary school anchor
SMU
Balanced profile with 3 program stops and a peak score of 93.6.
Quick Answers
Headline records use countable season rows after completed-game fallback. Partial seasons and provisional placeholders are called out separately.
230 countable games, 62.6% win rate.
7 countable seasons at SMU.
23 full season rows; partial and backfilled current rows are separated.
12 games using AP ranking at game time.
4 games using AP ranking at game time.
Battle for the Iron Skillet games in this dataset.
3 scored postseason games in this dataset.
0 College Football Playoff-labeled games since 2014.
Matched by coach team-season against the national championship dataset.
Career records use countable coach-season rows. Zero-game placeholders are excluded from aggregates until a completed-game fallback can verify the record.
Completed-game fallback uses scored games joined by coach, team, and season; advanced ratings are left blank when the season summary has not supplied them.
Latest completed coached game in this dataset: Dec 3, 1949. Current and future zero-game placeholders are kept visible but excluded from headline records.
Track how the coach's season-to-season performance changed over time, where the peak landed, and where each school stint appears.
Focus on where peaks separate, where floors hold, and how the shape of each career changed over time.
Active comparison point
12-1 • SRS 26.0 • SP Overall —
Win %
92.3%
YoY SRS
+19.6
SP Off / Def
— / —
Finish
Unranked
Comparison context
Focus a point to inspect how it stacks up against the rest of the field.
Track career record against ranked opponents with switchable poll source and ranking timing.
Using AP Top 25 rankings at the time of each game; week-one games use the week-one ranking release when available.
Top 25
5-11-2
Top 10
2-8-2
Top 5
0-3-1
| 1949 Regular Week 7 | SMU | Kentucky | #11 | W20-7 |
| 1949 Regular Week 6 | SMU | Rice | #7 | L27-41 |
| 1949 Regular Week 4 | SMU | Missouri | #16 | W28-27 |
| 1948 Regular Week 5 | SMU | Missouri | #9 | L14-20 |
| 1948 Postseason Week 1 | SMU | Oregon | #9 | W21-13 |
| 1947 Regular Week 8 | SMU | Texas | #7 | W14-13 |
| 1947 Regular Week 7 | SMU | UCLA | #18 | W7-0 |
| 1947 Postseason Week 1 | SMU | Penn State | #4 | T13-13 |
| 1946 Regular Week 8 | SMU | Texas | #20 | L3-19 |
| 1946 Regular Week 6 | SMU | Rice | #14 | L7-21 |
| 1945 Regular Week 6 | SMU | Oklahoma State | #8 | L12-26 |
| 1941 Regular Week 7 | SMU | Texas | #10 | L0-34 |
| 1941 Regular Week 3 | SMU | Fordham | #3 | L10-16 |
| 1939 Regular Week 5 | SMU | Notre Dame | #9 | L19-20 |
| 1939 Regular Week 3 | SMU | Oklahoma | #6 | T7-7 |
| 1938 Regular Week 6 | SMU | Pittsburgh | #4 | L7-34 |
| 1937 Regular Week 5 | SMU | Vanderbilt | #18 | L0-6 |
| 1936 Regular Week 4 | SMU | Fordham | #3 | L0-7 |
Each stint expands by seasons coached. Deeper color signals a stronger average SRS over that stretch.
SMU
1945-1949 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS 13.7 • Win % 65.1%
SMU
1935-1941 • 7 seasons
Avg SRS 11.9 • Win % 65.5%
Texas A&M
1929-1933 • 5 seasons
Avg SRS 6.7 • Win % 53.1%
TCU
1923-1928 • 6 seasons
Avg SRS 1.6 • Win % 64.5%
Compare strength, identity, steadiness, and ceiling through normalized bars with raw SP and SRS context underneath.
These bars are normalized against the full coach dataset. Raw SP and SRS values stay visible so the profile reads as evidence, not decoration.
Start with total quality before splitting style and variance.
Not enough data to compare.
Not enough data to compare.
Normalized score; raw SP overall stays underneath for reference.
Madison Bell
Insufficient sample
Insufficient sample
Normalized against the full tracked coach pool.
See how each stint compared with what that program usually looked like outside that same span.
1945-1949 • 32-16-5
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.4 during vs 4.6 baseline
+1.8
Avg SRS
Higher is better
13.7 during vs 2.4 baseline
+11.4
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
40.0% during vs 20.0% baseline
+20.0%
1935-1941 • 47-24-3
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
6.7 during vs 6.0 baseline
+0.7
Avg SRS
Higher is better
11.9 during vs 9.0 baseline
+2.9
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
14.3% during vs 0.0% baseline
+14.3%
1929-1933 • 24-21-3
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
4.8 during vs 6.4 baseline
-1.6
Avg SRS
Higher is better
6.7 during vs 9.2 baseline
-2.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
1923-1928 • 33-17-5
Compared with this school's baseline outside that stint over the prior 5 seasons (5 baseline seasons found).
Avg wins
Higher is better
5.5 during vs 4.4 baseline
+1.1
Avg SRS
Higher is better
1.6 during vs -11.9 baseline
+13.5
Avg SP Overall
Higher is better
— during vs — baseline
—
Ranked finish rate
Higher is better
0.0% during vs 0.0% baseline
+0.0%
High Points
Best Season
SMU 1935
12-1 • SRS 26.0
Biggest Improvement
SMU 1935
12-1 • 19.6 SRS
Best Offensive Season
Unavailable
Best Defensive Season
Unavailable
Setbacks
Lowest SRS Season
TCU 1924
4-5 • SRS -7.6
Biggest Drop
Texas A&M 1930
2-7 • -17.9 SRS
Full transparency into every season in the coaching record. Positive YoY values indicate improvement from the prior season.
| SMU | 1949 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 55.0% | — | — | 13.2 | — | — | — | -7.8 | -31.4% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1948 | 11 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 86.4% | — | #10 | 21.0 | — | — | — | +0.6 | -4.5% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1947 | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 90.9% | — | #3 | 20.4 | — | — | — | +14.4 | +45.9% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1946 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 1 | 45.0% | — | — | 6.0 | — | — | — | -2.1 | -0.4% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1945 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | 8.1 | — | — | — | -2.7 | -4.5% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1941 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 50.0% | — | — | 10.8 | — | — | — | -4.0 | -35.0% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1940 | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 85.0% | — | #16 | 14.8 | — | — | — | +2.2 | +20.0% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1939 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 65.0% | — | — | 12.6 | — | — | — | +10.4 | +5.0% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1938 | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 60.0% | — | — | 2.2 | — | — | — | -5.3 | +14.5% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1937 | 11 | 5 | 6 | 0 | 45.5% | — | — | 7.5 | — | — | — | -2.0 | -9.6% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1936 | 10 | 5 | 4 | 1 | 55.0% | — | — | 9.5 | — | — | — | -16.5 | -37.3% | Season summary |
| SMU | 1935 | 13 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 92.3% | — | — | 26.0 | — | — | — | +19.6 | +27.3% | Season summary |
| Texas A&M | 1933 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 65.0% | — | — | 6.4 | — | — | — | +5.2 | +15.0% | Season summary |
| Texas A&M | 1932 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | 1.2 | — | — | — | -8.4 | -20.0% | Season summary |
| Texas A&M | 1931 | 10 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 70.0% | — | — | 9.6 | — | — | — | +10.4 | +47.8% | Season summary |
| Texas A&M | 1930 | 9 | 2 | 7 | 0 | 22.2% | — | — | -0.8 | — | — | — | -17.9 | -33.3% | Season summary |
| Texas A&M | 1929 | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 55.6% | — | — | 17.1 | — | — | — | +13.0 | -24.4% | Season summary |
| TCU | 1928 | 10 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 80.0% | — | — | 4.1 | — | — | — | -9.7 | +24.4% | Season summary |
| TCU | 1927 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 55.6% | — | — | 13.8 | — | — | — | +7.2 | -22.2% | Season summary |
| TCU | 1926 | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 77.8% | — | — | 6.6 | — | — | — | +12.2 | -5.6% | Season summary |
| TCU | 1925 | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 83.3% | — | — | -5.6 | — | — | — | +2.0 | +38.9% | Season summary |
| TCU | 1924 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% | — | — | -7.6 | — | — | — | -5.6 | 0.0% | Season summary |
| TCU | 1923 | 9 | 4 | 5 | 0 | 44.4% | — | — | -2.0 | — | — | — | — | — | Season summary |
Popular comparisons are fan-facing matchups. Statistical comps are matched by style, strength band, volatility band, peak range, and career length.
same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.3
Avg SRS 8.8 • Peak SRS 21.7 • 18 seasons
Best finish #4 • Volatility 8.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 8.7 • Peak SRS 24.2 • 29 seasons
Best finish #1 • Volatility 8.8
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.2
Avg SRS 7.3 • Peak SRS 21.2 • 27 seasons
Best finish #5 • Volatility 8.0
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 1.6
Avg SRS 6.9 • Peak SRS 24.0 • 12 seasons
Best finish Unranked • Volatility 8.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.9
Avg SRS 7.5 • Peak SRS 21.9 • 25 seasons
Best finish #5 • Volatility 7.3
Open profile →same balanced identity • avg SRS within 0.2
Avg SRS 8.3 • Peak SRS 26.4 • 16 seasons
Best finish #9 • Volatility 8.0
Open profile →