Usage Score
20.1
Player Dossier
2014-2015Tennessee
WR • 6'0" • Newport News, VA, USA
Von Pearson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
20.1
Efficiency
70.7
Consistency
52.6
Season Value
60.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Tennessee
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Von Pearson, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Tennessee. Von Pearson reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Tennessee paired 409 primary output with 70.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2015 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 70.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2015 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
34.1
Efficiency
70.7
Usage
20.1
Consistency
52.6
Best Game by takeover score
Northwestern
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Northwestern: 32. Bowling Green: 48. Oklahoma: 0. Unknown: 9. Arkansas: 30. Georgia: 25. Alabama: 15. Kentucky: 37. South Carolina: 121. North Texas: 24. Missouri: 28. Vanderbilt: 40
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Northwestern: 2 by 100. Bowling Green: 2 by 100. Unknown: 1 by 60. Arkansas: 3 by 66.7. Georgia: 2 by 83.3. Alabama: 2 by 50. Kentucky: 5 by 49.3. South Carolina: 8 by 100. North Texas: 3 by 53.3. Missouri: 7 by 26.7. Vanderbilt: 3 by 88.9
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
South Carolina
Best efficiency game
100 vs Northwestern
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 1/1 | vs Northwestern | W 45-6 | — | 2 | 32 | 10.7 | 16 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 11/28 | vs Vanderbilt2+ TD | W 53-28 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 2 | 18 |
| Sun 11/22 | @ Missouri | W 19-8 | — | 7 | 28 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/14 | vs North Texas | W 24-0 | — | 3 | 24 | 5.3 | 8 | 0 | 18 |
| Sat 11/7 | vs South Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | W 27-24 | — | 8 | 121 | 15.1 | 15.10 | 1 | 37 |
| Sat 10/31 | @ Kentucky | W 52-21 | — | 5 | 37 | 7.4 | 7.40 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 10/24 | @ Alabama | L 14-19 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 10/10 | vs Georgia | W 38-31 | — | 2 | 25 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/3 | vs Arkansas | L 20-24 | — | 3 | 30 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/19 | vs Unknown | — | — | 1 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 9/12 | vs Oklahoma | L 24-31 | — | — | — | -3 | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/5 | vs Bowling Green | W 59-30 | — | 2 | 48 | 16.3 | 24 | 0 | 45 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Tennessee
2014-2015
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Tennessee | 393 | 64.5 | 17.8 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Tennessee | 393 | 64.5 | 17.8 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Tennessee | 409 | 70.7 | 20.1 | 16 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Tennessee | 409 | 70.7 | 20.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
121
Primary metric
121 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Arkansas State
71
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
71 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Iowa
75
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
75 receiving yards with a 71.4 efficiency score.
#4
South Carolina
55
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
55 receiving yards with a 91.7 efficiency score.
#5
Kentucky
44
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Tennessee
409 primary output · 70.7 efficiency · 20.1 usage
60.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Tennessee
60.9
409 primary · 70.7 efficiency · 20.1 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Tennessee
58.7
393 primary · 64.5 efficiency · 17.8 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
802
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Von Pearson quick answers