Usage Score
11.6
Player Dossier
2013-2017Ohio
LB • 6'0" • 222 lbs • Grove City, OH, USA
Chad Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.2 disruption score.
Usage Score
11.6
Efficiency
39.2
Consistency
57.1
Season Value
31.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Ohio
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chad Moore, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Ohio. Chad Moore shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 39.2 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Ohio paired 14.5 primary output with 39.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 39.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Central Michigan
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
39.2
Usage
11.6
Consistency
57.1
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UAB: 2. Unknown: 0. Purdue: 1. Eastern Michigan: 2. Massachusetts: 2. Central Michigan: 3. Bowling Green: 0.5. Kent State: 1. Miami (OH): 2. Toledo: 1. Akron: 0. Buffalo: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UAB: 4 by 36.7. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Purdue: 7 by 39.2. Eastern Michigan: 8 by 53.3. Massachusetts: 12 by 70. Central Michigan: 9 by 67.5. Bowling Green: 3 by 17.5. Kent State: 5 by 30.8. Miami (OH): 9 by 57.5. Toledo: 6 by 35. Akron: 8 by 33.3. Buffalo: 5 by 20.8
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Central Michigan
Best efficiency game
70 vs Massachusetts
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/22 | vs UABSplash game | W 41-6 | 4 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Buffalo | L 24-31 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/15 | @ Akron | L 34-37 | 8 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 11/9 | vs Toledo | W 38-10 | 6 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/1 | vs Miami (OH) | W 45-28 | 9 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Kent State | W 48-3 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Bowling Green | W 48-30 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Central MichiganSplash game | L 23-26 | 9 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Massachusetts10+ tackles | W 58-50 | 12 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Eastern Michigan | W 27-20 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Purdue | L 21-44 | 7 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio | 15 | 39.1 | 9.5 | 15 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio | 15 | 39.1 | 9.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio | 14.5 | 39.2 | 11.6 | -0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio | 14.5 | 39.2 | 11.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 68.6 takeover score.
#2
Central Michigan
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.6 takeover score.
#3
Massachusetts
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.5 takeover score.
#4
Eastern Michigan
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.5 takeover score.
#5
UAB
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Ohio
14.5 primary output · 39.2 efficiency · 11.6 usage
31.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · Ohio
31.6
14.5 primary · 39.2 efficiency · 11.6 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Ohio
28.7
15 primary · 39.1 efficiency · 9.5 usage
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
164
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 25 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Chad Moore quick answers