Usage Score
17.9
Player Dossier
2010-2016BYU
Mitchell Juergens
WR • 5'10" • Houston, TX, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Mitchell Juergens reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67
Consistency
46.1
Season Value
52.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · BYU
101112131414151516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 9
- Program Path
- BYU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: California
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mitchell Juergens, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason · BYU. Mitchell Juergens reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason
BYU paired 424 primary output with 79.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 67 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · BYU
Games
10
Receiving Yards / G
33.3
Efficiency
67
Usage
17.9
Consistency
46.1
Best Game by takeover score
Utah State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah: 52. UCLA: 10. West Virginia: 50. Michigan State: 24. Mississippi State: 0. Boise State: 57. Cincinnati: 24. Unknown: 82. Massachusetts: 24. Utah State: 10
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah: 8 by 43.3. UCLA: 1 by 66.7. West Virginia: 5 by 66.7. Michigan State: 2 by 80. Boise State: 4 by 95. Cincinnati: 4 by 40. Unknown: 6 by 91.1. Massachusetts: 3 by 53.3. Utah State: 1 by 66.7
Split Comparison
Wins16.4 · n=5 · -25.9 vs Losses
Losses42.3 · n=4 · +25.9 vs Wins
First Half27.2 · n=5 · -12.2 vs Second Half
Second Half39.4 · n=5 · +12.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Unknown
Best efficiency game
95 vs Boise State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | vs Utah State | W 28-10 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Massachusetts | W 51-9 | — | 3 | 24 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Unknown | — | — | 6 | 82 | 13.7 | 13.70 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Cincinnati | W 20-3 | — | 4 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 11 |
| Fri 10/21 | @ Boise State | L 27-28 | — | 4 | 57 | 14.3 | 14.30 | 0 | 33 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Mississippi State | W 28-21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | @ Michigan State | W 31-14 | — | 2 | 24 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 20 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ West Virginia | L 32-35 | — | 5 | 50 | 10 | 10 | 1 | 25 |
| Sun 9/18 | vs UCLA | L 14-17 | — | 1 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 10 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ UtahHigh volume | L 19-20 | — | 8 | 52 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 0 | 12 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
BYU
2010-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201020112012201320142014201520152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2011 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2012 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2013 Regular Season | BYU | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2014 Postseason | BYU | 424 | 79.6 | 11.2 | 424 |
| 2014 Regular Season | BYU | 424 | 79.6 | 11.2 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | BYU | 471 | 58.5 | 12.7 | 47 |
| 2015 Regular Season | BYU | 471 | 58.5 | 12.7 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | BYU | 333 | 67 | 17.9 | -138 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
California
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
107
Primary metric
107 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Boise State
172
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
172 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
82
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
82 receiving yards with a 91.1 efficiency score.
#4
Memphis
87
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Boise State
57
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
57 receiving yards with a 95 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Postseason · BYU
424 primary output · 79.6 efficiency · 11.2 usage
56.7
#2
2014 Regular Season · BYU
56.7
424 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 11.2 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · BYU
52.1
333 primary · 67 efficiency · 17.9 usage
Milestones
2
100+ receiving yards
2
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
1,228
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.