Usage Score
27.6
Player Dossier
2015-2016Charlotte
Austin Duke
WR • 5'9" • Charlotte, NC, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Austin Duke reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
76
Consistency
67.1
Season Value
66.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Charlotte
1516
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 2
- Program Path
- Charlotte
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Unknown
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Austin Duke, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Charlotte. Austin Duke reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Charlotte paired 803 primary output with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 76 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2016 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Regular Season · Charlotte
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
66.9
Efficiency
76
Usage
27.6
Consistency
67.1
Best Game by takeover score
UTSA
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisville: 54. Unknown: 103. Eastern Michigan: 84. Temple: 26. Old Dominion: 30. Florida Atlantic: 111. Florida International: 47. Marshall: 76. Southern Miss: 11. Rice: 34. Middle Tennessee: 112. UTSA: 115
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisville: 5 by 72. Unknown: 4 by 100. Eastern Michigan: 9 by 62.2. Temple: 4 by 43.3. Old Dominion: 4 by 50. Florida Atlantic: 6 by 100. Florida International: 3 by 100. Marshall: 7 by 72.4. Southern Miss: 1 by 73.3. Rice: 5 by 45.3. Middle Tennessee: 8 by 93.3. UTSA: 3 by 100
Split Comparison
Wins66 · n=3 · +3.3 vs Losses
Losses62.8 · n=8 · -3.3 vs Wins
First Half68 · n=6 · +2.2 vs Second Half
Second Half65.8 · n=6 · -2.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Florida Atlantic
Best efficiency game
100 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/27 | @ UTSA100 receiving yards | L 14-33 | — | 3 | 115 | 30 | 38.30 | 1 | 76 |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Middle Tennessee100 receiving yards · High volume | L 31-38 | — | 8 | 112 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 55 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Rice | L 21-22 | — | 5 | 34 | 3.5 | 6.80 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 11/5 | @ Southern Miss | W 38-27 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/22 | @ Marshall | W 27-24 | — | 7 | 76 | 8.7 | 10.90 | 0 | 27 |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Florida International | L 26-27 | — | 3 | 47 | 13 | 15.70 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 10/9 | @ Florida Atlantic100 receiving yards | W 28-23 | — | 6 | 111 | 17 | 18.50 | 1 | 69 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Old Dominion | L 17-52 | — | 4 | 30 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Temple | L 20-48 | — | 4 | 26 | 5.8 | 6.50 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Eastern MichiganHigh volume | L 19-37 | — | 9 | 84 | 8.3 | 9.30 | 0 | 25 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown100 receiving yards | — | — | 4 | 103 | 21.3 | 25.80 | 1 | 76 |
| Thu 9/1 | @ Louisville | L 14-70 | — | 5 | 54 | 10.8 | 10.80 | 1 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Charlotte
2015-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20152016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 Regular Season | Charlotte | 534 | 50.7 | 25.4 | — |
| 2016 Regular Season | Charlotte | 803 | 76 | 27.6 | 269 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Unknown
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
166
Primary metric
166 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida Atlantic
111
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
111 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Middle Tennessee
112
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
112 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
UTSA
115
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
115 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Unknown
103
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Charlotte
803 primary output · 76 efficiency · 27.6 usage
66.3
#2
2015 Regular Season · Charlotte
43.8
534 primary · 50.7 efficiency · 25.4 usage
Milestones
6
100+ receiving yards
4
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Career Facts
1
Career teams
2
Seasons tracked
1,337
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 2 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.