Usage / Role
13%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2013-2016Navy
WR • 6'4" • Las Vegas, NV, USA
Jamir Tillman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
13%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
17
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
23
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Navy
Snapshot
Player Story
Jamir Tillman built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a wide receiver from Las Vegas, NV wearing No. 4, spending time with Navy. The clearest part of Jamir Tillman's career was his receiving role: 91...
Read the storyJamir Tillman, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Navy. Jamir Tillman reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Navy | 2 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 33.8 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Navy | 11 | 20 | 386 | 3 | 72.2 |
| 2015 Postseason | Navy | 12 | 2 | 27 | 0 | 78.3 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Navy | 12 | 27 | 570 | 5 | 78.3 |
| 2016 Postseason | Navy | 13 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 87.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Navy | 13 | 38 | 615 | 2 | 87.5 |
Related Context
Jamir Tillman played WR for Navy. Across 4 tracked seasons, Jamir Tillman recorded 51 rushing yards, 1,626 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Navy.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Navy paired 631 primary output with 85.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Air Force
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
48.5
Efficiency
85.6
Usage
46.6
Consistency
64.4
Best Game by takeover score
Air Force
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Louisiana Tech: 16. Fordham: 21. UConn: 75. Tulane: 47. Air Force: 128. Memphis: 15. South Florida: 76. Notre Dame: 41. Tulsa: 56. East Carolina: 66. SMU: 8. Temple: 49. Army: 33
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Louisiana Tech: 2 by 53.3. Fordham: 2 by 70. UConn: 4 by 100. Tulane: 3 by 100. Air Force: 9 by 94.8. Memphis: 1 by 100. South Florida: 4 by 100. Notre Dame: 4 by 68.3. Tulsa: 2 by 100. East Carolina: 2 by 100. SMU: 1 by 53.3. Temple: 3 by 100. Army: 3 by 73.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Air Force
Best efficiency game
100 vs Temple
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/23 | vs Louisiana Tech | L 45-48 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 12/10 | @ Army | L 17-21 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 12/3 | vs Temple | L 10-34 | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 | 16.30 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/26 | @ SMU | W 75-31 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 11/19 | @ East Carolina | W 66-31 | — | 2 | 66 | 33 | 33 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 11/12 | vs Tulsa | W 42-40 | — | 2 | 56 | 21.3 | 28 | 0 | 32 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Notre Dame | W 28-27 | — | 4 | 41 | 9.4 | 10.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Fri 10/28 | @ South Florida | L 45-52 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 43 |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Memphis | W 42-28 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 1 | 15 |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Air Force100 receiving yards · High volume | L 14-28 | — | 9 | 128 | 14.2 | 14.20 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Tulane | W 21-14 | — | 3 | 47 | 15.7 | 15.70 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs UConn | W 28-24 | — | 4 | 75 | 18.8 | 18.80 | 0 | 47 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Fordham | W 52-16 | — | 2 | 21 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 0 | 12 |
Player Story
Jamir Tillman built his college career from 2013 through 2016 as a wide receiver from Las Vegas, NV wearing No. 4, spending time with Navy. The clearest part of Jamir Tillman's career was his receiving role: 91 catches, 1,626 receiving yards, 10 touchdowns, and 51 rushing yards across 38 career games in the available record. His career also includes 51 rushing yards and 3 tackles, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. That gives Jamir Tillman's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Navy
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Navy | 12 | 40 | 11.3 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Navy | 386 | 87.1 | 34.8 | 374 |
| 2015 Postseason | Navy | 597 | 79.1 | 55.2 | 211 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Navy | 597 | 79.1 | 55.2 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Navy | 631 | 85.6 | 46.6 | 34 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Navy | 631 | 85.6 | 46.6 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
vs Rutgers
Week 4 · L 24-31
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
99
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
99 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
@ Houston
Week 13 · L 31-52 · Conference game
162
Receiving Yards
100 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
162 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
@ Air Force
Week 5 · L 14-28
128
Receiving Yards
98.3 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
128 receiving yards with a 94.8 efficiency score.
#4
@ Air Force
Week 6 · L 21-30
63
Receiving Yards
87.9 takeover
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
vs Army
Week 15 · W 21-17
102
Receiving Yards
87.7 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Navy
631 primary output · 85.6 efficiency · 46.6 usage
87.5
#2
2016 Regular Season · Navy
87.5
631 primary · 85.6 efficiency · 46.6 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Navy
78.3
597 primary · 79.1 efficiency · 55.2 usage
3
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.