Usage / Role
26%
Rotational defensive role
lowfeatured
Player Dossier
2013-2017Buffalo
Chris Ford
DT • 6'3" • 310 lbs • Medina, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Chris Ford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15 disruption score.
Impact Production
33
Developing production for a defensive lineman
lowelite
Reliability
19
Sporadic game-to-game production
lowhigh
Star Power
52
Limited ceiling signals so far
limitedstar
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
1314151617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Unique Seasons
- 5
- Program Path
- Buffalo
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Player Story
Chris Ford built his college career from 2013 through 2017 as a defensive tackle from Medina, OH wearing No. 58, spending time with Buffalo. The clearest part of Chris Ford's career was his defensive production: 60...
Read the story2★
- Committed To
- Buffalo
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2013
Chris Ford, DT. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Regular Season · Buffalo. Chris Ford shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 15 disruption score.
Stat Footprint
Career production snapshot
- Tackles
- 60
- TFL
- 4
- Sacks
- 2
- QB hurries
- 2
Quick Answers
Chris Ford quick answers
- Latest team and position
- Buffalo · DT
- Career Tackles
- 60
- Tracked sample
- 5 unique seasons · 5 entries · 20 games
- Best season
- 2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
- Top game
- Bowling Green
- Recruit profile
- 2-star · Medina · Buffalo
- High school pipeline
- Medina · 5 FBS recruits · 2 drafted players
- Latest roster
- No. 58 · Class 2017
- 2017 Tackles rank
- 30 tackles · DT 57th (top 23%) · Mid-American 130th (top 24%) · National 1,391st (top 25%)
Season Ledger
Crawlable season-by-season stats
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 9 | 30 | 3 | 1 | - | - | 0 | 42.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 11 | 30 | 1 | 1 | 2 | - | 0 | 38.1 |
Related Context
Keep exploring Chris Ford
Chris Ford played DT for Buffalo. Across 5 tracked seasons, Chris Ford recorded 60 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Buffalo.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Buffalo paired 4 primary output with 18.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 15 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Bowling Green
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
15
Usage
3.4
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Minnesota: 0. Army: 0. Colgate: 0. Florida Atlantic: 0. Kent State: 1. Northern Illinois: 1. Miami (OH): 0. Akron: 0. Bowling Green: 2. Ball State: 0. Ohio: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Minnesota: 3 by 12.5. Army: 5 by 20.8. Colgate: 1 by 4.2. Florida Atlantic: 2 by 8.3. Kent State: 1 by 14.2. Northern Illinois: 1 by 14.2. Miami (OH): 5 by 20.8. Akron: 3 by 12.5. Bowling Green: 3 by 32.5. Ball State: 4 by 16.7. Ohio: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins0.5 · Games = 6 · +0.3 vs Losses
Losses0.2 · Games = 5 · -0.3 vs Wins
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Bowling Green
Best efficiency game
32.5 vs Bowling Green
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 11/24 | vs Ohio | W 31-24 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/17 | @ Ball State | W 40-24 | 4 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Wed 11/8 | vs Bowling GreenSplash game | W 38-28 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Akron | L 20-21 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Miami (OH) | L 14-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Northern Illinois | L 13-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Kent State | W 27-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Florida Atlantic | W 34-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Colgate | W 33-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Army | L 17-21 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | @ Minnesota | L 7-17 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Player Story
Chris Ford story
Chris Ford built his college career from 2013 through 2017 as a defensive tackle from Medina, OH wearing No. 58, spending time with Buffalo. The clearest part of Chris Ford's career was his defensive production: 60 tackles, 4 tackles for loss, and 2 sacks across 20 career games in the available record. That gives Chris Ford's career enough real context without stretching the story beyond the available production.
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Buffalo
2013-2017
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
20132014201520162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Buffalo | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Buffalo | 4 | 18.3 | 4.2 | 4 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Buffalo | 4 | 15 | 3.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
vs Bowling Green
Week 11 · W 38-28 · Conference game
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Havoc Plays
73.1 takeover
2 disruption/tackle impact with 73.1 takeover score.
#2
@ Bowling Green
Week 13 · L 19-27 · Conference game
2
Havoc Plays
68.6 takeover
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 68.6 takeover score.
#3
vs Ball State
Week 7 · L 21-31 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
46.9 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.9 takeover score.
#4
vs Northern Illinois
Week 7 · L 13-14 · Conference game
1
Havoc Plays
38.3 takeover
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.3 takeover score.
#5
vs Kent State
Week 6 · L 20-44 · Conference game
0.5
Havoc Plays
32.2 takeover
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 32.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Regular Season · Buffalo
4 primary output · 18.3 efficiency · 4.2 usage
42.1
#2
2017 Regular Season · Buffalo
38.1
4 primary · 15 efficiency · 3.4 usage
#3
2013 Regular Season · Buffalo
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Next best actions
Keep exploring Chris Ford
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.