Usage Score
19.2
Player Dossier
2013-2016Army
LB • 6'1" • Tucson, AZ, USA
Jeremy Timpf shows a high-volume tackler profile with 46.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
19.2
Efficiency
46.4
Consistency
57
Season Value
35.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Army
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jeremy Timpf, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Army. Jeremy Timpf shows a high-volume tackler profile with 46.4 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Army paired 3 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 46.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Texas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.4
Efficiency
46.4
Usage
19.2
Consistency
57
Best Game by takeover score
North Texas
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Texas: 3. Temple: 0. Rice: 1. UTEP: 1.5. Buffalo: 1.5. Unknown: 0. North Texas: 3. Wake Forest: 1. Air Force: 1. Notre Dame: 0.5. Unknown: 2. Navy: 2
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Texas: 15 by 80. Temple: 8 by 33.3. Rice: 6 by 35. UTEP: 2 by 23.3. Buffalo: 5 by 35.8. Unknown: 3 by 12.5. North Texas: 12 by 80. Wake Forest: 9 by 47.5. Air Force: 12 by 60. Notre Dame: 6 by 30. Unknown: 10 by 61.7. Navy: 9 by 57.5
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Texas
Best efficiency game
80 vs North Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 12/27 | @ North Texas10+ tackles · Splash game | W 38-31 | 15 | 12 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/10 | vs Navy | W 21-17 | 9 | 4 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs Unknown10+ tackles · Splash game | — | 10 | 8 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Notre Dame | L 6-44 | 6 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Air Force10+ tackles | L 12-31 | 12 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Wake Forest | W 21-13 | 9 | 8 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs North Texas10+ tackles · Splash game | L 18-35 | 12 | 8 | — | 1.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Buffalo | L 20-23 | 5 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ UTEP | W 66-14 | 2 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Rice | W 31-14 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/2 | @ Temple | W 28-13 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Army
2013-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Army | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Army | 3 | 20 | — | 3 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Army | 1 | 20 | — | -2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Army | 16.5 | 46.4 | 19.2 | 15.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Army | 16.5 | 46.4 | 19.2 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
North Texas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 72.6 takeover score.
#2
North Texas
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 71.3 takeover score.
#3
Ball State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
1
Primary metric
Game with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#5
Wake Forest
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Army
3 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
41.2
#2
2015 Regular Season · Army
40.4
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Army
35.6
16.5 primary · 46.4 efficiency · 19.2 usage
6
Impact games
3
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
97
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 16 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jeremy Timpf quick answers