Player Dossier

2013-2017

Tulsa

C.J. Gooden

LB • 6'1" • 230 lbs • Ashdown, AR, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

C.J. Gooden shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.

Usage / Role

8%

Rotational defensive role

lowfeatured

Impact Production

7

Developing production for a linebacker

lowelite

Reliability

15

Sporadic game-to-game production

lowhigh

Star Power

17

Limited ceiling signals so far

limitedstar

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Tulsa

131415161617

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Unique Seasons
5
Program Path
Tulsa
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Navy
3★

Recruit Profile

Class 2013 · Rating 0.8133

Ashdown · Ashdown, AR

Committed To
Tulsa
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2013

C.J. Gooden, LB. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2015 Regular Season · Tulsa. C.J. Gooden shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 4.2 disruption score.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
6

Quick Answers

C.J. Gooden quick answers

Latest team and position
Tulsa · LB
Career Tackles
6
Tracked sample
5 unique seasons · 6 entries · 6 games
Best season
2015 Regular Season · Tulsa
Top game
Navy
Recruit profile
3-star · Ashdown · Tulsa
High school pipeline
Roanoke Catholic School · 1 FBS recruit · 0 drafted players
Latest roster
No. 59 · Class 2017
2017 Tackles rank
1 tackles · LB 1,034th (top 94%) · American Athletic 435th (top 81%) · National 4,690th (top 82%)

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2013 Regular SeasonTulsa00-0--0-
2014 Regular SeasonTulsa00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonTulsa10-0--050
2016 PostseasonTulsa41-0--037.4
2016 Regular SeasonTulsa44-0--037.4
2017 Regular SeasonTulsa11-0--037

Related Context

C.J. Gooden played LB for Tulsa. Across 5 tracked seasons, C.J. Gooden recorded 6 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Tulsa.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season

Tulsa paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 5.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Navy

Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Tulsa

Games

4

Havoc Plays / G

0

Efficiency

5.2

Usage

0.8

Consistency

100

Best Game by takeover score

Navy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Central Michigan: 0. East Carolina: 0. Navy: 0. Cincinnati: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Central Michigan: 1 by 4.2. East Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Navy: 2 by 8.3. Cincinnati: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0 · Games = 3 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0 · Games = 1 · +0 vs Wins

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

4 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

Navy

Best efficiency game

8.3 vs Navy

Result
Mon 12/19vs Central MichiganW 55-1011000
Sat 11/26vs CincinnatiW 40-3710000
Sat 11/12@ NavyL 40-4221000
Sun 11/6vs East CarolinaW 45-2410000

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Tulsa

    2013-2017

    Opening stop

Season Value Progression

201320142015201620162017
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2013 Regular SeasonTulsa0
2014 Regular SeasonTulsa00
2015 Regular SeasonTulsa000
2016 PostseasonTulsa05.20.80
2016 Regular SeasonTulsa05.20.80
2017 Regular SeasonTulsa04.20.80

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

@ Navy

Week 11 · L 40-42 · Conference game

Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

0

Havoc Plays

6.1 takeover

0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.1 takeover score.

#2

vs Central Michigan

Week 1 · W 55-10 · Postseason

0

Havoc Plays

3.6 takeover

Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.6 takeover score.

#3

@ Oklahoma State

Week 1 · L 24-59

0

Havoc Plays

3.6 takeover

Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.6 takeover score.

#4

vs Cincinnati

Week 13 · W 40-37 · Conference game

0

Havoc Plays

3.3 takeover

Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.3 takeover score.

#5

vs East Carolina

Week 10 · W 45-24 · Conference game

0

Havoc Plays

3.1 takeover

Win with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

0 disruption/tackle impact with 3.1 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by Season Value

2015 Regular Season · Tulsa

0 primary output · 0 efficiency · usage

50

#2

2016 Postseason · Tulsa

37.4

0 primary · 5.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage

#3

2016 Regular Season · Tulsa

37.4

0 primary · 5.2 efficiency · 0.8 usage

Milestones

0

Impact games

0

Splash games

0

10+ tackle games